Refractive Eye Surgery: Physics or Electrical Engineering?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheZebra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eye
AI Thread Summary
A freshman physics and computer science student is exploring career options in refractive eye surgery machine building and research, particularly in laser technologies like LASIK and PRK. The student is considering whether to major in electrical engineering or physics and is planning to pursue a PhD. Key discussions emphasize the importance of selecting a graduate program that aligns with specific research interests rather than focusing solely on the major. Engaging with faculty involved in relevant research, such as Dr. Jim Schwiegerling, is recommended to gain insights into the best undergraduate preparation. The consensus suggests that practical experience in the desired field during PhD studies is crucial for securing future employment, regardless of the specific department or degree.
TheZebra
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I am a freshman physics and computer science student thinking about what I want to do after I graduate. I have always been obsessed with the eye and its functions. I would like to get into refractive eye surgery machine building/research, specifically focusing on the laser in areas such as LASIK, PRK and Lightwave surgery.

I was wondering if an electrical engineering major or a physics major would be more beneficial. I currently am planning on going to graduate school for a PhD but I am wondering what field this would fall under: biomedical engineering, electrical engineering, biomedical optics or maybe even a biology degree?
Here are some references for what lightwave vision is (it is my main interest). Also here is http://www.optics.arizona.edu/research/faculty/profile/jim-schwiegerling, he is an optical engineer at the University of Arizona, and currently leading the field in lightwave research. Here is something more scholarly on lightwave vision surgery.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not send Dr. Schwiegerling an email asking him what he thinks is best way to go about it? I'm not sure anyone here would be able to accurately answer your question.

Anyway, it sounds interesting. I've had corneal topography done a few times on my eye after an injury. It's pretty amazing what they do.
 
TheZebra said:
I was wondering if an electrical engineering major or a physics major would be more beneficial. I currently am planning on going to graduate school for a PhD but I am wondering what field this would fall under: biomedical engineering, electrical engineering, biomedical optics or maybe even a biology degree?

I think it's more important to find a program that does the kind of research you want to do. I wouldn't be surprised if it could occur in anyone of those departments. In other words, you'll have a lot better chance securing a job in the field if you acquire experience in the field during your Ph.D. work, regardless of department, particularly if you advisor knows other people in the industry.

In my field (fusion and plasma physics), people get Ph.Ds in Astrophysics, Physics, Applied Physics, Nuclear Engineering, and a few others. We all do very similar types of work despite the different departments. And if you had one of the above degrees but did research at a non-fusion related program, e.g. Astrophysics studying galaxy evolution or Nuc. Eng. studying fire propagation in power plants, you'd have a pretty difficult time getting time getting a postdoc in fusion related stuff. The department matters far less than the research you do.

So find people at universities doing that research and make note of those programs. Contact them and find out what is the best undergrad preparation to get into said graduate programs.
 
Thanks for the responses everyone. kinkmode the comparison you made to your field was very helpful. I will start emailing professors and finding out what I should be studying as an undergraduate.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top