Refractive index and Maxwell theory

  • Thread starter Petar Mali
  • Start date
  • #1
290
0
Maxwell theory

[tex]n=\sqrt{\epsilon_r \mu_r[/tex]

Refractive index for water is [tex]n=1,33[/tex]. For water [tex]\epsilon_r=81, \mu_r=1[/tex] so it should be

[tex]n=9[/tex]

Why we have so big anomaly for water?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
SpectraCat
Science Advisor
1,395
2
Maxwell theory

[tex]n=\sqrt{\epsilon_r \mu_r[/tex]

Refractive index for water is [tex]n=1,33[/tex]. For water [tex]\epsilon_r=81, \mu_r=1[/tex] so it should be

[tex]n=9[/tex]

Why we have so big anomaly for water?
The index of refraction and the reduced electric permittivity are both frequency dependent quantities, they are not constants. The constant value of 81 you refer to is the reduced electric permittivity of room temperature water in the limit that the frequency goes to zero. A frequency of zero is clearly a bad approximation for the optical frequencies where index of refraction is typically measured.

My guess is that the index of refraction of water for very low frequency radiation probably *is* around 9 ... that is probably part of the reason why radio waves cannot penetrate the water very effectively, whereas shorter wavelength visible light penetrates much further.
 

Related Threads on Refractive index and Maxwell theory

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
Top