Regarding applicability of Maxwell's equations on microscopic structures.

AI Thread Summary
Maxwell's equations (ME) remain applicable even at the microscopic scale, but they are classical and do not account for quantum phenomena like photons. To address quantum effects, quantum electrodynamics (QED) is necessary, which can also manifest in macroscopic systems, such as microwave resonators in cavity-QED experiments. The observation of quantum effects is influenced more by energy scales and temperatures than by the physical size of objects. Conventional electronic devices like LEDs and HEMTs typically do not require consideration of QED. Understanding the transition from classical to quantum frameworks is crucial for exploring electrodynamics at small scales.
otaKu
Messages
26
Reaction score
2
So from what I seem to understand up until now, Maxwell's equations usually work while assuming that the fields are continuous and smooth instead of the actual complexity at the atomic scale. However, as we move more and more towards the microscopic realm, a point comes when we cannot ignore this miniscule field variations and we need to change our approach. What exactly is that length scale? Is there a specific term for it? What changes do we need to apply to the macroscopic equations to make them work at this regime? I apologise if some of the questions in the thread don't make any sense, I'm rather new to Electrodynamics, especially at the microscopic level and I was wondering about the length scale where things will get troublesome. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no specific length scale for this. The ME always work, even for extremely small objects.
That said, the ME are -sort of- classical equations and there is e.g. no concept of a photon. Hence, to describe quantum effects you need a formalism known as quantum electrodynamics (QED) which is what you would e.g. use in quantum optics.
However, QED effects can -and frequently are- seen in macroscopic objects. A good example would the microwave resonators used in cavity-QED experiments which are many centimeters in size.
What determines whether you see quantum effects in an experiment is not the physical size of the objects, it is rather the energy scales (and temperatures) involved; typically you need very well engineered environments.
 
f95toli said:
There is no specific length scale for this. The ME always work, even for extremely small objects.
That said, the ME are -sort of- classical equations and there is e.g. no concept of a photon. Hence, to describe quantum effects you need a formalism known as quantum electrodynamics (QED) which is what you would e.g. use in quantum optics.
However, QED effects can -and frequently are- seen in macroscopic objects. A good example would the microwave resonators used in cavity-QED experiments which are many centimeters in size.
What determines whether you see quantum effects in an experiment is not the physical size of the objects, it is rather the energy scales (and temperatures) involved; typically you need very well engineered environments.
So is it safe for me to assume that I probably won't have to deal with quantum electrodynamics if I am dealing with conventional electronic devices such as LEDs and HEMTs?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top