Regarding Inverse Laplace Transforms

flouran
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
I was looking through some tables of Laplace Transforms on f(t) the other day, and I noticed that in all cases, as s \to \infty, F(s) \to 0. A question that I have been trying to prove is that if \lim_{s\to\infty}F(s) = 0, then does that necessitate whether F(s) can undergo an inverse Laplace transform (i.e. by the Bromwich integral)?

I suspect that the answer is "no", but if anyone has some attempt at a proof I would appreciate it (my idea would be to use Post's inversion formula and utilizing the Grunwald-Letnikov differintegral for evaluating F^{(k)}\left(\frac{k}{t}\right), but so far this has been futile)?

Thanks (and if my question needs any clarification please let me know),
flouran
 
Physics news on Phys.org
flouran said:
I was looking through some tables of Laplace Transforms on f(t) the other day, and I noticed that in all cases, as s \to \infty, F(s) \to 0. A question that I have been trying to prove is that if \lim_{s\to\infty}F(s) = 0, then does that necessitate whether F(s) can undergo an inverse Laplace transform (i.e. by the Bromwich integral)?
No.
flouran said:
I suspect that the answer is "no", but if anyone has some attempt at a proof I would appreciate it (my idea would be to use Post's inversion formula and utilizing the Grunwald-Letnikov differintegral for evaluating F^{(k)}\left(\frac{k}{t}\right), but so far this has been futile)?
Managed to prove it.
 
flouran said:
I was looking through some tables of Laplace Transforms on f(t) the other day, and I noticed that in all cases, as s \to \infty, F(s) \to 0. A question that I have been trying to prove is that if \lim_{s\to\infty}F(s) = 0, then does that necessitate whether F(s) can undergo an inverse Laplace transform (i.e. by the Bromwich integral)?

Interesting. One book that I read gives |sF(s)| < M as a sufficient condition for the Bromwich integral to exist. With this condition it is not possible to invert F(s)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}}. But of course we can find the inverse from the Laplace transform table.

Is there a more less restricted sufficient condition? As you stated \lim_{s\to\infty}F(s) = 0 doesn't works.
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...
Back
Top