Regarding Schwartz inequality and integration bounds

p4wp4w
Messages
8
Reaction score
5
Based on Schwartz inequality, I am trying to figure out why there
should/can be the "s" variable which is the lower bound of the
integration in the RHS of the following inequality:
## \left \|\int_{-s}^{0} A(t+r)Z(t+r) dr \right \|^{2} \leq s\int_{-s}^{0}\left \| A(t+r)Z(t+r) \right \|^{2} dr, ##
instead of:
## \left \|\int_{-s}^{0} A(t+r)Z(t+r) dr \right \|^{2} \leq \int_{-s}^{0}\left \| A(t+r)Z(t+r) \right \|^{2} dr. ##
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes S.G. Janssens and Samy_A
p4wp4w said:
Based on Schwartz inequality, I am trying to figure out why there
should/can be the "s" variable which is the lower bound of the
integration in the RHS of the following inequality:
## \left \|\int_{-s}^{0} A(t+r)Z(t+r) dr \right \|^{2} \leq s\int_{-s}^{0}\left \| A(t+r)Z(t+r) \right \|^{2} dr, ##
instead of:
## \left \|\int_{-s}^{0} A(t+r)Z(t+r) dr \right \|^{2} \leq \int_{-s}^{0}\left \| A(t+r)Z(t+r) \right \|^{2} dr. ##
Apply the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality to the functions##f,\ g## defined by ##f(r)=A(t+r)Z(t+r)## and ##g(r)=1##.
 
  • Like
Likes p4wp4w
Samy_A said:
Apply the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality to the functions##f,\ g## defined by ##f(r)=A(t+r)Z(t+r)## and ##g(r)=1##.
Sure. My confusion was because of the example in my mind that s can be a very small value which then the upper bound will be also very small and as a result, physically conservatism but again mathematically correct. Thank you very much.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top