Regions; "Each point of the set is the center of a circle "

AI Thread Summary
A region in the plane is defined by two conditions: each point in the set must be the center of a circle that lies entirely within the set, and any two points in the set can be connected by a curve that also lies within the set. The first condition does not imply that the entire plane is a region; rather, it allows for bounded regions as long as there exists a finite distance from each point where the interior of the circle remains within the set. Clarification was provided regarding the term "interior," which is crucial for understanding the definition. The discussion highlights the importance of distinguishing between "interior" and "exterior" in this context. Overall, the confusion stemmed from a typo that misled the interpretation of the conditions.
Nathanael
Homework Helper
Messages
1,650
Reaction score
246
"A set in the plane is called a region if it satisfies the following two conditions:
1. Each point of the set is the center of a circle whose entire enterior consists of points of the set.
2. Every two points of the set can be joined by a curve which consists entirely of points of the set."


I'm having trouble understanding the meaning of the first condition. Can someone please try to explain it in different words?

The way I'm understanding it, it seems to say that only an entire plane can be a region. (But this is obviously incorrect?)

How does the first condition allow for a bounded region?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Nathanael said:
1. Each point of the set is the center of a circle whose entire enterior consists of points of the set.
...
I'm having trouble understanding the meaning of the first condition. Can someone please try to explain it in different words?

The way I'm understanding it, it seems to say that only an entire plane can be a region. (But this is obviously incorrect?)

How does the first condition allow for a bounded region?

It says "a circle", not "every circle, no matter how large".
You could read it as saying that if a given point is in the region then there is some distance, perhaps not very large, such that every point closer than that distance to the given point is also in the region.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_set_-_example.png

##U## in the picture is a region. It's open (condition 1) and path connected (condition 2). Note the (open) circle around ##x## (denoted ##B_\epsilon(x)##, standard notation for "ball of radius ##\epsilon## centered at ##x##") which is contained entirely within ##U##. The dotted boundaries are meant to indicate that they aren't included as part of ##U## and ##B_\epsilon(x)##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you, I believe I understand now.

Edited;
Removed what I said because it wasn't what I meant (nor did it make much sense)
 
Last edited:
The word "enterior" in your initial post confused me. I did not know if you meant "interior" or "exterior"! And your post seemed to indicate that you were confused about that also.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The word "enterior" in your initial post confused me. I did not know if you meant "interior" or "exterior"! And your post seemed to indicate that you were confused about that also.

Sorry! That was just a typo that I failed to notice. I indeed meant interior.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top