Relabeling spin or angular momentum operators

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Spin or angular momentum in my book is formulated in the basis of eigenstates of the operator that measures the angular momentum along the z-axis. But in principle I guess this could just as well have been done in the basis of eigenstates of Ly or Lx. Will that change anything in the equations? For example for spin where all vectors and matrices are written in basis of the eigenstates of Sz.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aaaa202 said:
Spin or angular momentum in my book is formulated in the basis of eigenstates of the operator that measures the angular momentum along the z-axis. But in principle I guess this could just as well have been done in the basis of eigenstates of Ly or Lx. Will that change anything in the equations? For example for spin where all vectors and matrices are written in basis of the eigenstates of Sz.

The physics is the same in all directions. First we pick a direction that we'll measure the spin along, then we choose a set of coordinate axes. For convenience and because it simplifies the calculation, then we choose the axes so that one of them points along the chosen direction, and then by convention we label that axis z.
 
You can cyclically permute the directions. x->y, y->z, z->x (or reverse) without changing anything. A simple exercise is to verify that the math all works out using Pauli matrices.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
586
Replies
1
Views
496
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Back
Top