Relating partial width to helicity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between partial widths of decay modes of the kaon, specifically ##K^+\rightarrow \mu^+ \nu_\mu## and ##K^+\rightarrow e^+ \nu_e##. Participants explore the implications of helicity suppression on these decay processes and how it relates to the ratio of their partial widths.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that both decay modes are suppressed due to helicity considerations, with suppression factors related to the masses of the decay products.
  • Another participant states that the energies of the muon and electron can be approximated as equal in high-energy collisions, leading to proportionality between probabilities, branching fractions, and partial widths.
  • A question is raised about the validity of the energy approximation in the context of kaon decay, considering the rest energy of the kaon.
  • A response indicates that while the energy difference is not negligible for precision predictions, it is a small effect, and the ratio of partial widths is primarily influenced by the squared mass ratio of the electron and muon.
  • Further clarification is provided that the approximation holds well for the ratio of partial widths, with a noted percentage accuracy, and that this approximation is less valid for other decay processes, such as charged pion decay.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the relationship between helicity suppression and the ratio of partial widths, but there are nuances regarding the energy approximation and its implications for precision predictions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the approximation of energies and the dependence on the mass ratios, as well as the varying accuracy of these approximations across different decay processes.

sk1105
Messages
88
Reaction score
12
My lecture notes give an example of two decay modes of ##K^+##, namely ##K^+\rightarrow \mu^+ \nu_\mu## and ##K^+\rightarrow e^+ \nu_e##. Both of these decays are suppressed due to helicity considerations which I understand, and the suppression factors are ##\frac{m_\mu c^2}{E_\mu}## and ##\frac{m_ec^2}{E_e}## respectively.

My notes then say that the ratio of partial widths of these decays is given by ##\frac{\Gamma(K^+\rightarrow \mu^+ \nu_\mu)}{\Gamma(K^+\rightarrow e^+ \nu_e)} = \frac{m_\mu^2}{m_e^2}##.

This immediately follows on from the previous discussion, suggesting that there is some link or equivalence between decay amplitude suppression and partial widths, but I can't quite get my head round it. Thank you for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##E_\mu \approx E_e##, and probabilities (and branching fractions and partial widths, they are all proportional to each other) are proportional to the amplitude squared.
 
Ah ok the proportionality makes sense. My notes don't mention that we approximate the energies to be equal. In a high-energy collision it is clear that the difference in rest energy between the electron and the muon is negligible compared to ##\sqrt{s}##, but in this case are we saying it is negligible compared to the kaon rest energy?
 
Not negligible if you are interested in precision predictions, but it is a small effect. The 500 MeV from the kaon lead to roughly 250 MeV for the muon (gamma=2.3) and 250 MeV for the neutrino (gamma=very large). To conserve momentum, the muon gets a bit less energy and the neutrino gets a bit more - you can calculate the difference, it is not large. Electron and neutrino get 250 MeV each to a very good approximation.

The ratio is completely dominated by the squared electron to muon mass ratio.
 
Ah I think that has cleared it up for me; thanks for your help.
 
sk1105 said:
but in this case are we saying it is negligible compared to the kaon rest energy?
That's right. This approximation is good to about 10% in the ratio of partial widths, as the ratio of phase space factors is ##\frac{(m_K^2-m_e^2)^2}{(m_K^2-m_\mu^2)^2}=1.1##. This is a much worse approximation to make for charge pion decay (ratio of phase space factors ##\sim5.6##.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K