Relation between simple and second pendulum.

Thread starter paarsa
Start date Jun 5, 2011
Tags

Pendulum Relation

AI Thread Summary

The discussion centers on the relationship between a simple pendulum and a seconds pendulum, specifically defining the latter as one that completes a period in exactly two seconds. The key point is that the length of a seconds pendulum is critical for its operation, with a precise measurement of 0.994 meters required. This length ensures that the pendulum swings with the correct timing. The conversation emphasizes the importance of pendulum length in determining its period. Understanding this relationship is essential for accurate pendulum design and function.

Jun 5, 2011

paarsa

what is the relation between simple and second pendulum?

Physics news on Phys.org

Jun 5, 2011

Yuqing

Please define what you mean by a second pendulum. If you mean the seconds pendulum where each period is exactly 2 seconds, then the relation is simply of length. A seconds pendulum needs a specific length to operate. (0.994m to be exact)

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...

View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

View full post »

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

View full post »