Relation between Time-Dilation and Radioactivity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter universal_101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radioactivity Relation
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
universal_101
Messages
324
Reaction score
3
Is it true that all the Experiments which are intend to prove Time-Dilation of SR 'directly', are
based on radioactive half-lives extension ?

For example, cesium atomic clocks in GPS satellites, Muon decay etc.


Moreover, if it is true, ... and correlations between nuclear decay rates and solar activities is confirmed in near future.

will this undermine the absoluteness of the nature of Time-dilation of SR.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It won't undermine SR as SR is based on reasoning outside of radioactivity. SR makes the assumption that the speed of light if the same for all observers in inertial frames of reference. We observet he time-dilation in cesium clocks because they tick so fast and we can measure the ticks so accurately that even at slower speeds of jet aircraft we can detect the time dilation effect.

At much higher speeds even a mechanical clock would show the same time dilation effect relative to a stationary observer with a similar clock.
 
jedishrfu said:
It won't undermine SR as SR is based on reasoning outside of radioactivity. SR makes the assumption that the speed of light if the same for all observers in inertial frames of reference. We observet he time-dilation in cesium clocks because they tick so fast and we can measure the ticks so accurately that even at slower speeds of jet aircraft we can detect the time dilation effect.

At much higher speeds even a mechanical clock would show the same time dilation effect relative to a stationary observer with a similar clock.

Point taken.

But don't you think that if radioactivity is found to depend on something other than the relative motion, in this case Sun, then we will have to fit the role of Sun and SR to explain Time Dilation of decaying particles.
 
universal_101 said:
Point taken.

But don't you think that if radioactivity is found to depend on something other than the relative motion, in this case Sun, then we will have to fit the role of Sun and SR to explain Time Dilation of decaying particles.

The relation between decay and the sun dubious (borderline crank science), and small, even if granted. The effect of time dilation on decay is precisely established and large. Further, the effects (if the former is real) are orthogonal - suppose decay is faster in the summer. That simply constitutes the baseline for measurement of effects of time dilation.
 
Atomic clocks do not utilize radioactive decay to tell time.

If solar activity affected decay rates, I'd think it would be a much bigger problem for QM. I won't hold my breath.