Relation of atomic and mass enrichment?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between atomic and mass enrichment in the context of nuclear physics, specifically focusing on a formula from a textbook related to reactor physics. Participants are exploring the derivation of a specific equation and the underlying concepts of atomic density and enrichment.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the derivation of a specific equation from a textbook, questioning the origin of a particular factor.
  • Another participant suggests substituting variables to relate atomic and mass enrichment, proposing a transformation of the equation using atomic weights.
  • A third participant discusses the necessity of atomic density for calculating macroscopic cross-sections and emphasizes the importance of mass-based enrichment for practical measurements and accountability.
  • One participant acknowledges confusion regarding the role of densities in the calculations, indicating a struggle to connect the concepts presented in the text.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and approaches to the problem, with no consensus reached on the derivation or the application of the concepts discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific equations and relationships without fully resolving the mathematical steps or assumptions involved in their derivations.

OneMoreName
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

I am preparing for a job interview in some nuclear facility and have to refresh my knowledge about nuclear stuff. So I started reading the book of Lewis "Fundamentals of reactor physics". I got stuck at page 35, formula (2.24). Does anyone have a clue how to arrive at this equation? Where does this factor 0.0128 come from? I played with the formulas a lot but never arrive at this equation. Help would be really appreciated guys. Since I am not allowed to put a link, please put a http: inside the following and you will see the page.

//i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb283/DidgeFrank/Grafik1.jpg
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Replace the N's in favor of the M's. Up to a constant factor, N ~ M/A, so Eq 2.20 is

ea = (M25/235)/((M25/235) + (M28/238))

Then get rid of the M's in favor of ew:

M25 = ew(M25 + M28)
M28 = (1 - ew)(M25 + (M28)

This gives you

ea = (ew/235)/((ew/235) + ((1 - ew)/238)))

so now just multiply out.
 
The calculation of macroscopic cross-section requires atomic density, and enrichment on an atomic basis would be necessary. For manufacturing and accountability, the mass-based enrichment is required, since it is much easier to measure mass, and accountability records are provided in terms of mass.

Bill K provided the method to compare mass fraction with atomic fraction.

Remember that for an element or isotope, N = ρA/M, where ρ = density, A = Avogadro's Number, and M = atomic mass (of the element, which is weight by isotopic fractions, or by isotopic mass, if ρ is the isotpic mass density).

Try 238/235.
 
Last edited:
Oh yes, thanks! I was fooling around with the densities because it is mentioned in the text but this leads to nowhere.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
16K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
16K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K