Relation of atomic and mass enrichment?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a user preparing for a job interview at a nuclear facility and seeking clarification on a specific equation from Lewis's "Fundamentals of Reactor Physics." The user is particularly confused about the origin of the factor 0.0128 in equation (2.24) and has attempted various calculations without success. Other participants suggest that understanding the relationship between mass and atomic fractions is crucial, emphasizing the need for atomic density in calculating macroscopic cross-sections. They also highlight the importance of using mass-based enrichment for practical measurements and accountability in nuclear contexts. The conversation underscores the complexities of nuclear physics calculations and the need for precise understanding of isotopic relationships.
OneMoreName
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

I am preparing for a job interview in some nuclear facility and have to refresh my knowledge about nuclear stuff. So I started reading the book of Lewis "Fundamentals of reactor physics". I got stuck at page 35, formula (2.24). Does anyone have a clue how to arrive at this equation? Where does this factor 0.0128 come from? I played with the formulas a lot but never arrive at this equation. Help would be really appreciated guys. Since I am not allowed to put a link, please put a http: inside the following and you will see the page.

//i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb283/DidgeFrank/Grafik1.jpg
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Replace the N's in favor of the M's. Up to a constant factor, N ~ M/A, so Eq 2.20 is

ea = (M25/235)/((M25/235) + (M28/238))

Then get rid of the M's in favor of ew:

M25 = ew(M25 + M28)
M28 = (1 - ew)(M25 + (M28)

This gives you

ea = (ew/235)/((ew/235) + ((1 - ew)/238)))

so now just multiply out.
 
The calculation of macroscopic cross-section requires atomic density, and enrichment on an atomic basis would be necessary. For manufacturing and accountability, the mass-based enrichment is required, since it is much easier to measure mass, and accountability records are provided in terms of mass.

Bill K provided the method to compare mass fraction with atomic fraction.

Remember that for an element or isotope, N = ρA/M, where ρ = density, A = Avogadro's Number, and M = atomic mass (of the element, which is weight by isotopic fractions, or by isotopic mass, if ρ is the isotpic mass density).

Try 238/235.
 
Last edited:
Oh yes, thanks! I was fooling around with the densities because it is mentioned in the text but this leads to nowhere.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Back
Top