Relationship between adhesion and friction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the relationship between adhesion and friction, specifically in the context of adhesive tape. It establishes that while simple (dry) friction is directly proportional to the normal force and independent of contact area, the adhesive forces of tape are constant and directly proportional to the weight of the object being adhered. The forces exerted by adhesive tapes are primarily electrical in nature, arising from intermolecular forces rather than traditional frictional forces. The concept of 'simple friction' is acknowledged but is not applicable to sticky surfaces like tape.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as friction and adhesion
  • Familiarity with the definitions of static and kinetic friction
  • Knowledge of intermolecular forces and their role in adhesion
  • Basic principles of electromagnetic interactions at the atomic level
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of adhesion in materials science
  • Explore the differences between static and kinetic friction in detail
  • Study intermolecular forces and their applications in adhesive technologies
  • Investigate the role of electromagnetic forces in material interactions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, materials science, and engineering, particularly those interested in the mechanics of adhesion and friction in practical applications.

Jazz
Messages
103
Reaction score
5
Maybe this question is pretty simple to tackle, but I’m really confused with it. Perhaps I’m just overthinking.

The question is:

The glue on a piece of tape can exert forces. Can these forces be a type of simple friction? Explain, considering especially that tape can stick to vertical walls and even to ceilings.

By simple friction means the force that opposes the motion of an object resting in a horizontal surface. So, simple friction is proportional to the normal force (source: http://cnx.org/contents/031da8d3-b525-429c-80cf-6c8ed997733a@8.9:32/College_Physics).

I really don’t get that concept of ‘simple friction’. After looking at Wikipedia I found that static and kinetic friction are a type of friction called Dry Friction, which resists lateral motion. Thus dry and simple friction would be the same.

According to what I understand, simple (dry) friction is:

- Directly proportional to the normal force.

- Independent of the area of contact.

The forces exerted by adhesive tapes, I think, are exactly the opposite: are inversely proportional to the weight of the object being stuck. If I stick a pencil to the wall, then the piece of tape will do the job but if I try to do the same with a metal bar (that weighs more), it will end unsticking. In order to avoid this I would need to put more tape, therefore increasing the area of contact.

Are these assumptions correct? If that were the case, what kind of forces does an adhesive tape exert?

Is the concept of ‘simple friction’ really used?Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jazz said:
The forces exerted by adhesive tapes, I think, are exactly the opposite: are inversely proportional to the weight of the object being stuck. If I stick a pencil to the wall, then the piece of tape will do the job but if I try to do the same with a metal bar (that weighs more), it will end unsticking. In order to avoid this I would need to put more tape, therefore increasing the area of contact.
You are right about the need to use more tape, but in the bolded text above is backwards. The force needed to support the object is directly proportional to its weight while the force exerted by a given piece of tape is constant. There's no inverse proportionality going on; the amount of tape required is directly proportional to the weight.

Are these assumptions correct? If that were the case, what kind of forces does an adhesive tape exert?
They are electrical if you dig down to the level of interactions between individual atoms at the surface of the tape.

Is the concept of ‘simple friction’ really used?
Yes, all the time, but not for things like tape which are sticky.
 
Nugatory said:
You are right about the need to use more tape, but in the bolded text above is backwards. The force needed to support the object is directly proportional to its weight while the force exerted by a given piece of tape is constant. There's no inverse proportionality going on; the amount of tape required is directly proportional to the weight.They are electrical if you dig down to the level of interactions between individual atoms at the surface of the tape.Yes, all the time, but not for things like tape which are sticky.

Thanks for answering.

So just to be sure, what would keep the pencil from falling is the electrical force, right? Would it have to do with chemical bonding?
 
Jazz said:
So just to be sure, what would keep the pencil from falling is the electrical force, right? Would it have to do with chemical bonding?

Generally we reserve the term "chemical bonding" for the electrical forces that cause atoms to form molecules and use "inter-molecular forces" for stickiness, cold welding, the way that solids retain their shape. All of these forces are ultimately electromagnetic in origin - they come from interactions between the charged particles that make up atoms - so as long as you understand the origin of the forces I wouldn't get too hung up on the terminology.
 
Nugatory said:
Generally we reserve the term "chemical bonding" for the electrical forces that cause atoms to form molecules and use "inter-molecular forces" for stickiness, cold welding, the way that solids retain their shape. All of these forces are ultimately electromagnetic in origin - they come from interactions between the charged particles that make up atoms - so as long as you understand the origin of the forces I wouldn't get too hung up on the terminology.

Excellent.

Thanks again !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K