Relationship between Free energy change and Equilibrium constant (K)

AI Thread Summary
The relationship between free energy change (ΔG°) and the equilibrium constant (K) is expressed by the equation ΔG° = -RT lnK, where R is the universal gas constant and T is temperature. In a reaction involving gases, such as aA(s) + bB(g) ⇌ cC(g) + dD(g), the equilibrium constant can be calculated using the vapor pressures or concentrations of the gaseous components. To find the vapor pressure of a specific compound, such as bB, it is necessary to relate K to the concentrations or pressures of all reactants and products involved. The example discussed involves calculating the vapor pressure of water at equilibrium for a reaction, highlighting that multiple gaseous components would require additional information to solve accurately. Understanding the stoichiometry and applying the ICE table is crucial for solving such equilibrium problems.
Jef123
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
1. I have a question regarding the equation ΔG° = -RT lnK. When solving for the equilibrium constant K, what is the relationship between the vapor pressure of each molecular compound in a reaction?

ΔG° = Free energy change
R = Universal gas constant
T = Temperature
K = equilibrium constant
*K can be solved for in concentration or pressure or solubility


2. Meaning, for the reaction aA(s) + bB(g) --> cC(g) + dD(g) where the lower case coefficients are the number of moles and the upper case coefficients are the molecular compounds. Assuming I solved for ΔG at a specific temperature and then solved for K If I wanted to find the the vapor pressure or the concentration of bB how would I relate the value of the equilibrium constant K to solve for B?

My thought is that 1/Bb = K. Is this correct?

There is a specific applied problem from where my question is derived, so if anyone would like me to post it to clarify areas where I may not be explicit enough, I can.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
C and D are gases as well, so they are part of K as well.

Hard to say what you are expected to do not knowing the problem, but typically you should find C and D from the stoichiometry (for example using ICE table).
 
Here's the problem:

A humidity sensor consists of a cardboard square that is colored blue in dry weather and red in humid weather. The color change is due to the reaction:

CoCl2(s) + 6 H2O(g) ⇌ [Co(H2O)6]Cl2(s)

For this reaction at 25 °C, ΔH° = -352 kJ/mol and ΔS° = -899 J/(K mol). Assuming that ΔH and ΔS are independent of temperature, what is the vapor pressure of water (in mm Hg) at equilibrium for the above reaction at 35 °C on a hot summer day?

I used the equation ΔG° = ΔH° - TΔS° at T = 35°C = 308.15 K. So, ΔG = -74973.15 J

Then, I used ΔG° = - RTlnK and solved for K at T = 308.15 Kelvin. Thus, K = 5.5 x 1012 atm.

This is where I am confused and had to look up the solution: 1/(H2O)6 = 5.5 x 1012. They then solved for H2O

I think I actually just understood what they did. wow. So if there was more than one gas in the equation then I would need more information to solve for the pressure of water because there would be more than one variable?
 
Jef123 said:
So if there was more than one gas in the equation then I would need more information to solve for the pressure of water because there would be more than one variable?

Yes.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top