A Relationship between magnetic potential and current density in Maxwell

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between magnetic potential and current density in the context of solving Maxwell's equations using finite element methods (FEM). It highlights a confusion regarding the assumption that current density (Jz) in the iron core can be set to zero when current flows only along the z-axis in a wire. This assumption leads to the conclusion that changes in the wire's current density do not affect the magnetic potential of the iron core, creating a contradiction. The conversation also mentions the importance of considering magnetization in the iron core, which introduces additional current density components that must be accounted for. Ultimately, the question posed was resolved, clarifying the relationship between current density and magnetic potential in this scenario.
JH_1870
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
I am currently studying to solve Maxwell's equations using FEM.

I have a question about Maxwell's equations while studying.

I understood that the magnetic potential becomes ▽^2 Az = -mu_0 Jz when the current flows only in the z-axis.

I also understood the effect of the current flowing in a conductor on the magnetic potential of the surrounding iron core by the Biot-Savar law. However, in the referenced FEM example, the current density (Jz) in the iron core is set to zero.

If the current flows only in the z-axis direction in the wire, it is considered correct that the z-axis current of the iron core is 0.

However, if this is applied as it is, it is understood that only Jz in the wire exists and Jz in the iron core is 0. Therefore, even if the current density of the wire is changed, it is understood that the magnetic potential of the iron core is not affected.

Obviously, the current density flowing in the conductor affects the magnetic potential of the surrounding iron core, but setting Jz of the iron core to 0 creates a contradiction.

Regarding this, I wonder if I have misunderstood the relationship between current density and magnetic potential, or if the method of setting Jz in the iron core to 0 is wrong.

I'm also wondering how to set the current density if the iron core's current density is not set to zero. The url below is my reference.

https://jorgensd.github.io/dolfinx-tutorial/chapter3/em.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know whether I have a completely definitive answer, but if the iron core develops a magnetization ## \vec{M} ##, you will get a ## J_m=\nabla \times \vec{M} ## that needs to be taken into account, and what goes hand-in-hand with this is the magnetic surface current density per unit length ## \vec{K}_m=\vec{M} \times \hat{n} ## that contributes to the vector potential.
 
  • Like
Likes JH_1870 and vanhees71
Charles Link said:
I don't know whether I have a completely definitive answer, but if the iron core develops a magnetization ## \vec{M} ##, you will get a ## J_m=\nabla \times \vec{M} ## that needs to be taken into account, and what goes hand-in-hand with this is the magnetic surface current density per unit length ## \vec{K}_m=\vec{M} \times \hat{n} ## that contributes to the vector potential.
Thanks, the question has been solved.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Happy holidays folks. So I spent some time over the Thanksgiving holidays and developed a program that renders electric field lines of swiftly moving charges according to the Liénard–Wiechert formula. The program generates static images based on the given trajectory of a charge (or multiple), and the images were compiled into a video that shows the animated field lines for harmonic movement and circular movement of a charge (or two charges). Video: The source code is available here...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K