Relationship of an object's acceleration with velocity while falling in a fluid

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how an object's acceleration in a fluid is influenced by its velocity. It clarifies that acceleration is related to velocity through the formula a = (v-u)/t, indicating that acceleration is the rate of change of velocity. The presence of a constant force acting on the object allows it to overcome the fluid's resistive force, resulting in acceleration. The conversation also references Stoke's Law as a relevant principle for understanding this relationship. Overall, the relationship between acceleration and velocity in a fluid is established through basic physics concepts.
HuaYongLi
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Could anyone please tell me how the acceleration of an object in a fluid varies with its velocity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry but to make it clearer do you mean to basically ask how prove that acceleration is related to velocity of an object that is moving in a fluid right?

So, that means that the object is traveling at a constant acceleration which technically means that there is an overall force acting on the object overcoming the resistive force of the fluid that enables it to accelerate. Hence, using the basic formula F=ma, that means that the object is accelerating due to a constant force acting on it.

And a = (v-u)/t

where u is the initial velocity at the start of a certain period of time and v is the final velocity at that period of time.

Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity so that is how it is related to the velocity? I hope I'm not lost. I'm scared I'm not making any sense here...
 
Sorry, my classmate used this account to post an question about his experiment I couldn't answer at that particular moment for him.
I just realized that the answer is simply a rehash of Stoke's Law.
 
Oh awesome man. Anyways, glad you found your answer:)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top