Relative Density of metal powder

AI Thread Summary
To determine the relative density of metal powders, one must consider the bulk density and the solid density of the metal. For Stainless Steel 316L powder, with a bulk density of 3000 kg/m^3 and a solid density of 8000 kg/m^3, the relative density calculation yields 0.375. The shape of the particles significantly influences the packing density; spherical particles can achieve a maximum density of about 75%, while irregular shapes typically result in lower densities due to inefficient packing. Proper handling and mixing of the powder are crucial for consistent density measurements across batches. Accurate determination of relative density requires careful measurement and consideration of particle shape and arrangement.
irfanirsyad
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
How can I determine relative density of solids in powdered form? or in other word... How do you determine relative density of metal powder... Thank you..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That depends on the powder,the shape of the individual particles and what you do with the powder. If you know the bulk density, multiply it with the density of your metal (as solid object).
 
Thank you very much for the prompt reply mfb. To be more precise, in my experiment... I would like to determine the relative density of 57 micron (spherical shape) Stainless Steel 316L powder... After poured inside a container, the bulk density is around 3000 kg/m^3. Since the density of 316L powder is 8000 kg/m^3, so the relative density should be 3000/8000 which is 0.375… Is it correct? Regarding your comment, how the shape of individual particle and what I do with the powder will affect the result? Thank you again….
 
That looks correct.

Imagine a powder consisting of small cubes of equal size: With good tools, you can arrange them one by one to fill the whole space with the cubes. But if you just fill some container, they will arrange somewhat randomly and have a lot of free space between them. If you then shake this container carefully, they tend to fill some of these spaces and get a higher density.
Now you have three different densities, depending on your handling of the powder.

With spheres, the highest possible density is ~75%.
With irregular shapes, it is often lower, as they can block each other in many ways.
 
And a mixture of big and small spheres can be more dense than just big spheres. For a reliable answer I reckon you have to measure samples and keep checking that the mix is consistent between batches.
 
Thank you very much mfb and sophiecentaur for the answers... I really appreciate them..
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top