Relative increase in fuel mass

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of relativistic mass in the context of a rocketship approaching the speed of light. Participants explore the implications of increasing mass and fuel efficiency as the rocket accelerates, questioning the nature of force and impulse in relativistic physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that as a rocketship approaches the speed of light, its relative mass and fuel mass increase, potentially leading to infinite force at light speed.
  • Another participant counters that while relativistic mass increases from an external frame of reference, the energy required to accelerate the rocket also increases, complicating the notion of infinite force.
  • A different viewpoint asserts that the relativistic mass of a rocket decreases due to the expulsion of fuel, which outweighs any relativistic mass increase, and emphasizes that impulse, not force, is the critical quantity.
  • One participant notes that from a stationary reference frame, the fuel mass appears to increase relativistically, while from the rocket's perspective, the fuel mass remains constant, barring the mass expelled during propulsion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of mass and force as a rocket approaches light speed, indicating that multiple competing models and interpretations exist without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of mass in different frames of reference and the implications of relativistic effects on fuel dynamics and propulsion efficiency.

schonovic
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
if a rocketship in space is approaching the speed of light and its relative mass is increasing then i assume the fuel mass is increasing which would make it more potent the closer the ship gets to the speed of light which would give it infinite force when the ship reaches the speed of light. what happens to prevent this from being true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The simple answer from the external frame of reference you imply:

As the mass of the fuel, and the rocketship itself, approaches an arbitrarily large value, so too does the force (or energy) required to accelerate it.


Wikipedia explains related aspects:

.." As seen from the center of momentum frame, the relativistic mass is also the invariant mass...For other frames, the relativistic mass ... includes a contribution from the "net" kinetic energy of the body (the kinetic energy of the center of mass of the body), and is larger the faster the body moves. Thus, unlike the invariant mass, the relativistic mass depends on the observer's frame of reference. ..."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_mass
 
schonovic said:
if a rocketship in space is approaching the speed of light and its relative mass is increasing then i assume the fuel mass is increasing which would make it more potent the closer the ship gets to the speed of light which would give it infinite force when the ship reaches the speed of light. what happens to prevent this from being true?
The relativistic mass of a rocket always decreases, never increases. This is for the same reason that the non-relativistic mass of a non-relativistic rocket always decreases: you are spewing lots of mass off the back end. That effect is always greater than the relativistic mass effect.

Also, the quantity of interest is not the force, but the impulse. You can make an arbitrarily high force by reducing the duration of your burn, but that doesn't change the impulse. If you work out the math, the impulse available from the remaining fuel is always strictly decreasing and always finite.
 
If you are in a stationary reference frame and watching the ship accelerate, then the mass of fuel on board the ship increases relativistically as the ship goes faster. If you are on board the ship, the fuel mass stays the same as it always was (not counting the mass that's expelled out the rocket engine), being the same density as if the ship had no velocity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 130 ·
5
Replies
130
Views
17K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
10K