Relative velocity in inertial frame

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the swimmer's velocity relative to the water and the river's current. It highlights the need to consider the swimmer's velocity as having two perpendicular components: one across the river's width and the other along the current. The correct approach involves using the width of the river and the swimmer's velocity across it to determine the time taken to cross. Participants clarify that the downstream speed should be factored in to find the horizontal distance traveled. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying vector components in solving the problem.
Satvik Pandey
Messages
591
Reaction score
12
The swimmer will move in the direction of resultant of his velocity and velocity of water.
Draw the diagram and the try to solve it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
velocity is a vector and has two components (e.g. v_x and v_y)
 
slaw155 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


So here's what I've got so far:
(a) v(swimmer relative to water) = v(swimmer relative to current) + v(current relative to water)
so v^2(swimmer relative to current) = 1.98^2 -0.508^2 -> this gives you v, and then you divide 2230m/v to get time, however, I end up getting the incorrect answer using this working (according to the textbook answer). And I need the correct answer to this to be able to answer (b).

You are using distance = width of the river , but dividing by the net speed of the swimmer .

The velocity of swimmer has two perpendicular components , one across the width of the river ,other along the flow of water .

What is the component of velocity across the width of the river ?
 
Vibhor said:
You are using distance = width of the river , but dividing by the net speed of the swimmer .

The velocity of swimmer has two perpendicular components , one across the width of the river ,other along the flow of water .

What is the component of velocity across the width of the river ?


So the velocity across the width of the river is 1.98m/s. So I would go 2230/1.98 to get the time? And then to get horizontal distance traveled I would multiply this time by 0.508 (the downstream speed)?
 
Correct
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top