Relative velocity of 2 vehicles

AI Thread Summary
Two vehicles depart from a fork, with Vehicle A traveling at 85 km/h north-east and Vehicle B at 104 km/h directly east. The discussion centers on calculating the relative velocity of Vehicle A with respect to Vehicle B using the equation aVb = Va - Vb. There is confusion regarding the direction of Vehicle B, with some participants mistakenly interpreting its direction as west. Clarifications highlight that the equation accounts for relative motion, emphasizing that if a slower vehicle is overtaken, it appears to move backward relative to the faster one. Understanding the correct application of relative velocity is crucial for accurate calculations.
Aashish Bharat
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Two vehicles leave simultaneously from a fork in a road. Vehicle A travels at a velocity of 85 km/h north-east. Vehicle B travels at 104 km/h directly east. Calculate the velocity of vehicle A relative to the velocity of vehicle B.

Answer (from memorandum): http://imgur.com/a/L0prH

I do not understand why is Vehicle B traveling west, an explanation on how why this was done would be appreciated!

aVb = Va - Vb (Velocity of A relative to velocity of B) when do you use this equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are in a car and get overtaken by another car, then relative to the faster car you are going backwards. Not so?
 
  • Like
Likes Aashish Bharat
PeroK said:
If you are in a car and get overtaken by another car, then relative to the faster car you are going backwards. Not so?
Damn it, they took the opposite direction of Vb from the equation aVb = Va - Vb. I should have known better
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top