Relativistic acceleration transformation

pantheid
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The given problem is that we have a rocket ship, accelerating at a constant rate of 1g (in its own instantaneous inertial rest frame) for 40 years. We must find the distance it travels in that time, as measured by an observer on earth.

Homework Equations


dx'=gamma*(dx-vdt)
dt'=gamma*(dt-vdx/c^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I have derived the relationship a'=a/(gamma^3*(1-uv/c^2)^3)

Given that the rocket has constant acceleration in its own rest frame, a'=g
Given that the observer on Earth is stationary, u=0

If we use these two facts, we get that g*gamma^3=a, which is nonsensical because that means that at very high velocities, the observed acceleration is higher than g when it should be lower. Where is my error?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pantheid said:
I have derived the relationship a'=a/(gamma^3*(1-uv/c^2)^3)

Given that the rocket has constant acceleration in its own rest frame, a'=g
Given that the observer on Earth is stationary, u=0
I don't believe this is the correct interpretation of u. Make sure you know the meaning of u and v in the formula.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top