Relativistic Conservation of Momentum Confusion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the conservation of momentum in relativistic collisions. A completely inelastic collision is analyzed in two frames: the S frame, where momentum is conserved, and the S' frame, moving at speed u. In the S' frame, relativistic velocity addition alters the expected momentum calculations, leading to the conclusion that momentum is not conserved. The key issue is the application of relativistic mechanics versus classical mechanics, which affects the momentum values before and after the collision. Ultimately, the participant resolves their confusion by recognizing a crucial detail in the equations presented in the book.
Pezz
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

Simple question yet it creating a lot of confusion in me and I need some clarification. This is an example given in a book I'm reading and I just don't understand one piece of it. In the S frame a completely inelastic collision between two particles traveling at each other at speed u and mass m will result in 2m as per conservation of momentum. The S' frame is moving at speed u along the positive x axis, and thus in that frame one of the particles is still while the other travels at speed 2u according to classical mechanics. However using relativistic velocity addition the speed of the oncoming particle is different and the book concludes that the momentum is not conserved because:

"Before the collision the momentum in the S' frame is p'=mu' ( where u' is the relativistic velocity of the oncoming particle ), whereas after the collision it is simply p'=2mu."

Can someone clarify this for me? Why is the momentum not conserved? Shouldn't u in p'=2mu for final momentum also be u'?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you need to provide more context. What's the book trying to show? Is the book analyzing the situation using Newtonian mechanics or relativistic mechanics?
 
I finally understood it... I was missing a small detail involving an equation that was right in front of me the whole time... thanks for offering your help, that was frustrating... I guess I should just take more time on understanding things :P
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top