How Is the Arctan Derived in Relativistic Coulomb Scattering?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of the arctan function in the context of relativistic Coulomb scattering, specifically referencing an equation from Landau and Lifgarbagez's "Classical Theory of Fields." The original problem presents an equation for the angle of deflection of a charged particle, but the source does not provide a clear derivation of the arctan result. A participant notes that while it's straightforward to derive an arccosine solution as r approaches infinity, the transition to arctan is not immediately obvious. The discussion suggests that using a right triangle approach, where the cosine and tangent relationships are applied, may help clarify the derivation. Overall, the thread seeks to elucidate the mathematical steps leading to the arctan result in the context of the problem presented.
Trickster2004
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi. Landau and Lifgarbages give an equation describing the angle of deflection of a charged particle of a given initial velocity and impact parameter. It's given on page 102 of their Classical Theory of Fields, available here: http://books.google.com/books?id=QI...X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5#PPA102,M1. It's in the solution to Problem 1, at the bottom of the page.

I'm just curious where the equation in Problem 1 came from, in particular where the arctan came from. It's simple to solve 39.4 for the angle letting r-->infinity, but that gives an arccos, not an arctan. L-L just state that as the answer without working through it, as if it's obvious. Does anyone see how to derive it?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have an equation of the form \cos\theta=\frac{a}{b}, then you can think of a being the adjacent side of a right triangle, b being the hypotenuse and hence \sqrt{b^2-a^2} as the opposite side \implies \tan\theta=\frac{\sqrt{b^2-a^2}}{a}
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top