Relativistic Mass and Volume Change in a Rapidly Expanding Sphere

Frogeyedpeas
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
suppose I have a 10 kg sphere with homogenous distribution of mass (aka density is same everywhere) that is 10 m^3. Now suppose I rapidly increased its radius at a speed of 1/2c m^3 (and because its homogenous the volume increased correspondingly). Now my question is whether that would cause the "relativistic mass" of the box to increase. Clearly some particles are moving at high velocity while one in the middle is stationary. Would it be possible to treat this entire system as opposed to each individual particle of mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sphere as a whole system is not moving and would not have any relativistic mass. However, let's do away with the term "relativistic mass", as it is confusing and doesn't need to be used any more. Instead we can use the term "momentum", as Einsteins equation e=mc^2 is actually an incomplete portion of the larger equation which uses momentum as well.

In a real world scenario this expansion would require a source of energy, and assuming this source of energy already existed inside the sphere then the total energy/mass of the system would not increase nor would it's momentum.
 
See, if one just considers the outer layer of the sphere; then, yes it is gaining momentum (ie becoming heavier) due to the lorentz factor, but at the same time as the volume expands this mass gets distributed around so the sphere is definitely becoming "heavier". Relativity says it has to. I was wondering if this could be measured by some lorentz-volume factor that measures the increase or decrease in the quantity (m/(1-v^2/c^2)^(1/2). But instead of using v one uses d(volume)/dt
 
Frogeyedpeas said:
so the sphere is definitely becoming "heavier". Relativity says it has to.
This is not correct if, as Drakkith mentioned, the source of energy was inside the sphere.

If the energy comes from outside the sphere then the mass of the sphere increases by the additional energy divided by c^2. If the energy comes from inside then the mass is unchanged.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top