Relativistic Momentum: Is It a Vector in Relativistic Energy?

In summary, relativistic momentum is a vector quantity that takes into account the effects of special relativity on an object's motion. It is dependent on an object's mass, velocity, and the speed of light, and follows the principles of relativity, such as the addition of velocities and the conservation of momentum. However, unlike classical momentum, relativistic momentum is not always conserved and can vary depending on the observer's frame of reference. This makes it a crucial concept in understanding the behavior of objects at high speeds and in the study of relativistic energy.
  • #1
jaketodd
Gold Member
508
21
Relativistic momentum is a vector, just as non-relativistic momentum is a vector, right? Part of the relativistic energy equation includes relativistic momentum. See here please: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/releng.html"

Could the relativistic momentum energy part of the relativistic energy equation be considered as a vector when the equation is computed for total relativistic energy? That is, does relativistic momentum, when taken in the context of relativistic energy as a whole, still have a vector? The answer to this question must be yes, because otherwise, without a vector for some of the relativistic energy, then the object would remain stationary. Another question please: I suppose the relativistic momentum could do without a vector in the context of relativistic energy, but then what would keep the object going...Is the relativistic kinetic energy portion of total relativistic energy a vector? Or, are both relativistic kinetic energy, and relativistic momentum, vectors in the context of computed relativistic energy? Or, I suppose you could simply say: Does relativistic energy, as a whole, have a vector component or components, and if so, what part of the relativistic energy has this/these vectors? Maybe this could sum it up: Relativistic energy must have some vector component because otherwise the object would be stationary, right?

Many Thanks,

Jake :zzz:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3


bcrowell said:
It sounds like you're asking about the energy-momentum four-vector: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-momentum The hyperphysics link you gave doesn't seem to discuss it.

Very good; thank you! Another question please: Is there such a thing as four-kinetic energy?
 
  • #4


jaketodd said:
Very good; thank you! Another question please: Is there such a thing as four-kinetic energy?

The fact that you're asking that question makes me think that you haven't read the WP article yet...?
 
  • #5


bcrowell said:
The fact that you're asking that question makes me think that you haven't read the WP article yet...?

So you're talking about four-velocity? I'm not sure if that creates four-kinetic energy or just goes into four-momentum.

Your wisdom please?

Thanks!

Jake
 
  • #6


Anyone please?
 
  • #7


Did you read the wiki yet? If so, what's your current understanding of the energy-momentum 4 vector?

If not - do you have some reason why not?
 
  • #8


pervect said:
Did you read the wiki yet? If so, what's your current understanding of the energy-momentum 4 vector?

If not - do you have some reason why not?

I think I understand it now. I think I just needed to read the article a couple more times for it to set.

Thanks,

Jake
 

Similar threads

Replies
67
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Back
Top