I Relativistic Notation in Waves: Confusion Solved

kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
If we have a plane wave, usually in Relativity notation it is written as ##A^\alpha = a^\alpha \exp(i x_\alpha k^\alpha)##. (I know we need to take the real part in the end). In cartesian coordinates, and two dimensions say, that ##x_\alpha k^\alpha## would be ##x^\alpha k_\alpha = x k_x + y k_y##. How does it reads in polar coordinates? ##x^\alpha' k_\alpha' = r k_r + \theta k_\theta = r [(\partial x/ \partial r)k_x + (\partial y/ \partial r)k_y] + \theta [(\partial x/\partial \theta )k_x + (\partial y/\partial \theta )k_y] = r (\cos\theta k_x + \sin\theta k_y) + \theta[(-r\sin\theta ) k_x + (r\cos\theta ) k_y]##. The first term is just equal to its version in Cartesian coordinates. But then there is that second term, which makes ##x^\alpha' k_\alpha' \neq x^\alpha k_\alpha##. I already expected this result from the fact that ##x^\alpha## do not transform like, and thus are not, four vectors. So a product like ##x^\alpha k_\alpha## will not be a scalar.

But then what does this result mean? A field like ##A^\alpha = a^\alpha \exp(i x_\alpha k^\alpha)## will not transform as a vector if the exponent is not a scalar. But it should transform as a vector. So what we do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to do non-Minkowski coordinates, then you should replace ##x^\alpha## by the event vector (which in Minkowski coordinates have the coordinates as components - just like the position vector in Cartesian coordinates in Euclidean space has the coordinates as components).
 
Orodruin said:
event vector
Sorry, I never heard about the event vector. What is it?
 
kent davidge said:
Sorry, I never heard about the event vector. What is it?
It is the same thing in Minkowski space as the position vector is in Euclidean space.
 
Orodruin said:
It is the same thing in Minkowski space as the position vector is in Euclidean space.
Ok. That makes a lot of sense.

- we know that in Minkowski coordinates the term has the form ##x^\alpha k_\alpha##;
- we also know that it should be a scalar;
- so we identify ##x^\alpha## as the components of a vector;

Do you know which symbol is used to denote this vector?
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
855
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
6K
Back
Top