Relativistic scattering Lab and CM frames

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relativistic scattering of two electrons and the relationship between the center of mass (CM) frame and the lab frame. It establishes that the speed of the CM frame with respect to the lab frame is equivalent to the speed of the electrons in the CM frame, even in the relativistic regime. The Lorentz velocity addition formula is referenced as a valid tool for demonstrating this relationship, emphasizing that the velocities in the CM frame differ from those in the lab frame, particularly in relativistic scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz velocity addition formula
  • Knowledge of relativistic mechanics
  • Familiarity with center of mass (CM) frame concepts
  • Basic principles of electron collisions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Lorentz velocity addition formula in detail
  • Explore relativistic mechanics and its implications on particle collisions
  • Learn about the standard configuration of reference frames in physics
  • Investigate the differences between relativistic and non-relativistic velocity transformations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativistic mechanics, and anyone studying particle collisions, particularly in the context of electron interactions.

trelek2
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I have the following problem:
Example: collision of 2 electrons
For non-relativistic scattering it is easy to show that the speed of the CM frame with respect to the lab frame is equal to the speed of the electrons in the CM frame, expoloiting the fact that in the lab frame, one of the electrons is at rest.

Now this also holds in the relativistic regime. I'm not really sure where does this follow from. Is it valid to take the lorentz velocity addition formula, and taking the speed of the particle in the lab frame to be 0 we see that for x-coordinate the speed of the electron in CM frame must then be uqual to to the speed of CM frame in lab frame. Saying that the lab and CM frames are in standard configuration makes this proof general enough?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your proof is correct. What's different between the relativistic and nonrelativistic cases is that in the relativistic case, the velocities in the c.m. frame are not half the velocity of the projectile in the lab frame.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
989
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
12K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K