Relativity: Changes & Extensions - 3 Questions Answered

  • Thread starter Thread starter ShayanJ
  • Start date Start date
ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
606
Hi people

I have three questions about relativity
1-Is the Relativity used now different from the one proposed by einstein?If yes,what are the changes?
2-Is Kaluza's theory accepted and being used now?
3-Is there other extensions to relativity like Kaluza's theory?What are they?Which of them is accepted and being used now?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would answer these as follows. Others may have different answers:

Shyan said:
I have three questions about relativity
1-Is the Relativity used now different from the one proposed by einstein?If yes,what are the changes?
Much work has been done since Einstein's time, and many things are much better understood, especially in General Relativity. Black holes, cosmology, and gravitational waves are three examples of things that are much better understood today than they were when Einstein proposed the theory. However, the basics of both Special and General Relativity have not changed, and have passed every experimental test to which they have been subjected.
Shyan said:
2-Is Kaluza's theory accepted and being used now?
3-Is there other extensions to relativity like Kaluza's theory?What are they?Which of them is accepted and being used now?
Kaluza-Klein theory, as originally proposed, is not believed today to be a correct theory. String theory, however, is the logical extension of Kaluza-Klein theory. String theory postulates multiple hidden dimensions instead of the one hidden dimension postulated by Kaluza-Klein theory. Whether these theories will ultimately turn out to be the desired "Theory of Everything", is still an open question. Many people have worked on this, but there is today no consistent theory that describes the other forces of nature in a geometric way, as General Relativity describes gravity.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top