Relativity: Impossible Scenario?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JrAcey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impossible
JrAcey
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Impossible scenario?!?

Aargh, pleeaase help me wrap my head around this whole relativity thing.

We just started the chapter on relativity at uni and our professor is telling us light speed is invariant and wants us to contemplate an impossible hypothetical scenario for next class! Help!

Here's the scenario:

A satellite is launched into deep space with a laser and particle accelerator onboard. The PA accelerates a proton to 97% of the speed of light, opens a hatch, and let's the proton fly out. The laser is situated adjacent to the PA opening and the instant the proton leaves, the laser emits a light pulse in the exact same direction.

OK, the proton is at .97c but yet it must measure the laser pulse racing ahead at light speed and not .03c? HUH??

Who's moving at what speed relative to whom? Doesn't the 97% light speed count for anything?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


From the point of view of the satellite, the light is indeed racing ahead of the proton at .03c. However, in the point of view of the proton itself, the light is racing ahead of it at 1c.
 


In order to measure the speed of the light pulse, the proton will have to put a mirror out in front of it a measured distance away. Then it needs to start a stopwatch at the moment of common launch and stop it when the reflected light puse gets back to the proton. the proton then takes twice the measured distance (because the light pulse has to travel both directions) and divide it by the measured time interval to get the speed of the light pulse. The proton will get c as the answer.
 


The proton can never achieve c as its mass would have to increase infinitely in order to do so. Even it was accelerated to 99.99% recurring of c it can never achieve c because of its increasing mass. That's because c is the ultimate speed limit in the universe according to GR and is defined by the speed of light in a vacuum. Therefore the light will always travel at c to the proton's point of view because a photon has zero rest mass unlike the proton or any other massive particle so nothing can catch up to it when it's moving through the vacuum.
 


JrAcey said:
Aargh, pleeaase help me wrap my head around this whole relativity thing.

We just started the chapter on relativity at uni and our professor is telling us light speed is invariant and wants us to contemplate an impossible hypothetical scenario for next class! Help!

Here's the scenario:

A satellite is launched into deep space with a laser and particle accelerator onboard. The PA accelerates a proton to 97% of the speed of light, opens a hatch, and let's the proton fly out. The laser is situated adjacent to the PA opening and the instant the proton leaves, the laser emits a light pulse in the exact same direction.

OK, the proton is at .97c but yet it must measure the laser pulse racing ahead at light speed and not .03c? HUH??

Who's moving at what speed relative to whom? Doesn't the 97% light speed count for anything?

Yes it is very strange and confusing.

Light moves at the same speed in every reference frame. It is completely unintuitive. You just have to accept it and get used to it.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Back
Top