Relativity & Light: Explaining an Observation Phenomenon

  • Thread starter Thread starter cody628496
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Relativity
cody628496
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
If you are traveling at the speed of light and you were to shine a light the observer wouldn't observe twice the speed of light? Please explain this phenomena to me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The phrase 'travelling at the speed of light' on it's own doesn't mean much, because ( according to Newton) one cannot distinguish 'rest' from a state of uniform motion. It is only meaningful to talk about the relative velocities of objects.

So it's customary to talk about two observers, who have a relative velocity. So each one sees the other approaching or departing.

Given this situation, neither will see the other have a relative velocity equal to the velocity of light (c). This is because the rule for addition of velocities precludes this.

Another postulate of relativity states that all observers see light traveling at the same speed. If either observer emits light, it will be seen by both to be traveling at c m/s.

This is counter-intuitive but that's what SR tells us.
 
If person A is traveling at speed v_A relative to you and throws object B directly away from you at speed v_B relative to himself, that object will have speed, relative to you,
\frac{v_A+ v_B}{1+ \frac{v_Av_B}{c^2}}

Note that, whatever v_A is, if v_B= c, that will give
\frac{v_A+ c}{1+ \frac{v_A}{c}}
multiplying both numerator and denominator by c, we have
\frac{c(v_A+ c)}{c+ v_A}= c

So no matter how fast A is moving relative to you, if he shines a light ahead of himself, it will have speed c relative to both of you.
 
Very nice that's the explanation i was looking for.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top