Relativity of Simultaneity: An Overview

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relativity of simultaneity in the context of Special Relativity, particularly focusing on the synchronization of clocks in different reference frames and the implications of Lorentz transformations. Participants explore the mathematical relationships and physical interpretations of time differences observed by different observers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario where synchronized clocks in reference frame S appear out of sync to an observer in reference frame S' due to the relativity of simultaneity.
  • The same participant questions the effectiveness of Lorentz transformations in reconciling the time differences observed by the two observers, seeking clarification on the physical interpretation of the results.
  • Another participant emphasizes the necessity of using mathematical expressions to clarify the situation, suggesting that the transformation might have been applied incorrectly.
  • A later reply reiterates the importance of correctly applying the Lorentz transformation, specifically mentioning the need to reverse the sign of the velocity when transforming back to the original frame.
  • One participant expresses confusion over the results obtained from applying the Lorentz transformation, noting that the derived time difference appears to contradict the initial synchronization of the clocks.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the interpretation of the results from the Lorentz transformation, and there are competing views on the correct application of the transformation equations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of the time differences calculated.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings in the application of Lorentz transformations and the dependence on the definitions of synchronization and reference frames. The discussion also highlights unresolved mathematical steps that contribute to the confusion.

wildebeest44
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I recently started studying Special Relativity an my book discusses the following:

Say I have synchronized two separated clocks in a reference frame S, if then an observer in another reference frame S' for whom the clocks are moving sees the clocks he would say those clocks are out of synchronization for him, as for him the light that was used to sync the clocks reaches one of them before the other.

Up to this point, I think I understand what is happening, but if then the observer in S' knowing about the relativity of simultaneity applies a Lorentz transformation to try and "see" the clocks as an observer in S would, it will, nevertheless, still find a non-zero difference between the times "shown" by the clocks, proportional to the distance separating them.

What does this mean?
Isn't the Lorentz transformation an attempt to find the space and time coordinates as they would be seen from other reference frames, and if so, why is it unsuccessful here?

What's the physical interpretation of the difference in time the observer in S' just found, considering is neither the difference he sees from his reference frame or the one seen by the original observer in S?

Thank you, and excuse me for not showing the math I don't how to write it here in a readable way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

This is difficult to answer without the maths. Just below the reply box there's a link to how to use LaTeX for maths. An example: $$x'=\gamma (x-vt) $$ Reply to my post to see how it's done.

An obvious guess is that if you transformed from S to S' using v=u, did you transform from S' back to S using v=u (wrong) or v=-u (right)? If that's not it have a read of the LaTeX link and post what you did. Then we can help without guessing. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wildebeest44
Ibix said:
Welcome to PF.

This is difficult to answer without the maths. Just below the reply box there's a link to how to use LaTeX for maths. An example: $$x'=\gamma (x-vt) $$ Reply to my post to see how it's done.

An obvious guess is that if you transformed from S to S' using v=u, did you transform from S' back to S using v=u (wrong) or v=-u (right)? If that's not it have a read of the LaTeX link and post what you did. Then we can help without guessing. :wink:

I just saw the guide, thanks, i'll give it a try.

So, suppose that clocks are placed in ##x_1## and ##x_2##, in S they are in sync so,
## \Delta t=0 ##

However in S', which is moving with speed u relative to S, we have for each clock
##t_1'=\gamma(t_1-\frac{u}{c^2}x_1) ##
##t_2'=\gamma(t_2-\frac{u}{c^2}x_2) ##
then for this observer the time interval between them is
##\Delta t' = t_2'-t_1'=\gamma(\Delta t - \frac{u}{c^2}\Delta x) ##
with ## \Delta t=0 ## because the clocks are in sync in S, then
##\Delta t' =- \gamma \frac{u}{c^2}\Delta x ##
Therefore, the clocks are out of sync for the observer in S'. But if I now tried to apply
##\Delta t'=\gamma \Delta t##
I would get
##\Delta t=-\frac{u}{c^2}\Delta x ##
Which is different to 0. This is the result I find troubling.

Thanks for your reply, I hope is clearer now :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
wildebeest44 said:
But if I now tried to apply
##\Delta t'=\gamma \Delta t##
I would get
##\Delta t=-\frac{u}{c^2}\Delta x ##
Which is different to 0. This is the result I find troubling.
Try the Lorentz transform again, but reversing the sign of ##u##. Don't just use the time dilation formula.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
978
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K