What is the Relativity of Simultaneity?

In summary: However, events that are separated along the direction of motion will not be simultaneous for both observers due to the difference in time dilation. So while it may be possible for some events to be simultaneous for both frames, it is not possible for all events to be simultaneous in both frames.
  • #1
Aziza
190
1
The common example demonstrating relativity of simultaneity is something like this:

Say there is Person #1 and #2, each on their own train, in the middle of the train from both ends. #1 thinks #2 is moving, but #2 thinks #1 is moving. Lightning hits both ends of the trains. In #1's reference frame, let's say that light from the events hits #1 at the same time. But #1 sees #2 moving, so #1 will believe that #2 sees one event before the other. The example thus ends that it is in fact true that #2 sees one event before the other.

But this is just from #1's reference frame! I mean, how do we know what #2 will actually see? We can't just judge from #1's reference what #2 will see?? According to #2, it is #1 that is moving, so #2 will say that #1 did not see the events at the same time, even though #1 says that he did see them at same time. So if we do not know purely from #2's reference what #1 actually saw, then by symmetry we can't say what #2 actually saw from #1's reference...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
We know because of what you said: you said in #1's frame the lightning hit both ends of the train at the same time and that's what makes it happen at different times in #2's frame. If you define a different scenario, then the outcome will be different.
 
  • #3
But this is just from #1's reference frame! I mean, how do we know what #2 will actually see?
You can simply track the light which is moving around (with detectors or something else), and find out that light from one side hits #2 before the other light is there.

According to #2, it is #1 that is moving, so #2 will say that #1 did not see the events at the same time
#2 will see the light rays reaching #1 at the same time. For a single point, "at the same time" is still well-defined.

It is possible to go through the whole process from the view of #2 to:
Both light rays hit #1 at the same time (this is true for all observers), but #1 is close to the back of the train at this time (because #1 moves towards the back). Therefore, the lightning strike at the front must have been earlier than the strike at the back.
 
  • #4
Aziza said:
The common example demonstrating relativity of simultaneity is something like this:

Say there is Person #1 and #2, each on their own train, in the middle of the train from both ends. #1 thinks #2 is moving, but #2 thinks #1 is moving. Lightning hits both ends of the trains.

As has been pointed out you supplied the vital parameter when you added the condition of simultaneous reception by #1.
Solely with this initial information above , it is not possible to conclude much other than both can't receive the flashes simultaneously.. Neither observer might receive the flashes simultaneously.

In fact, if you stipulated that the trains had the same rest length this would necessarily be the case.

This can be seen if you look at the event (A) of the lightning strike at the meeting of the front of train #1 with the rear of train #2.
At this time, according to the simultaneity of the clocks on train 1 the front of train 2 has not yet reached the back of train 1. = Event (B)
So (A) is earlier than (B)
According to the clocks on train 2 the back of train 1 has already passed the front of train 2
So event (A) is later than event (B)
Of course the reciprocal is true at the meeting of the front of train 2 and back of train1.

This might be a little hard to grasp at first but it not only relates length contraction to
simultaneity but is necessary to understanding the resolution of the contraction paradox I.e.; train 1 is longer than train 2 AND train2 is longer than train 1
 
Last edited:
  • #5
i would actually like to jump in with a question on same line..for 2 frames moving with uniform relative velocity to each other,can there actually be an event which is simultaneous to both frames?..since rate of time flow will differ for each frame its hard to perceive exactly how simultaneity would be acheived?
 
Last edited:
  • #6
nikeadidas said:
i would actually like to jump in with a question on same line..for 2 frames moving with uniform relative velocity to each other,can there actually be an event which is simultaneous to both frames?
To talk about simultaneity you need to have at least two events.

Since clock desynchronization only occurs along the direction of motion, you can have events that are separated along a line perpendicular to the motion occur simultaneously for both observers.
 

1. What is the concept of relativity of simultaneity?

The relativity of simultaneity is a concept in physics that states that the perception of simultaneity is relative to the observer's frame of reference. This means that events that appear to occur simultaneously to one observer may not appear simultaneous to another observer in a different frame of reference. This is a fundamental principle of Einstein's theory of special relativity.

2. How does the relativity of simultaneity affect our perception of time?

The relativity of simultaneity shows that time is not absolute and can differ between observers in different frames of reference. This means that two events that seem to occur simultaneously to one observer may not be simultaneous to another observer, and they may also measure different amounts of time between the same events. This challenges the traditional notion of time as a universal constant.

3. Can the relativity of simultaneity be observed in everyday life?

Yes, the relativity of simultaneity can be observed in everyday life. For example, if two people are riding in a train and one person drops a ball while the train is moving, the person on the train will see the ball fall straight down, while an observer outside the train will see the ball fall in a curved path due to the train's motion. This illustrates how the perception of simultaneity can differ between observers in different frames of reference.

4. How is the relativity of simultaneity related to the speed of light?

Einstein's theory of special relativity states that the speed of light is constant in all inertial frames of reference. This means that no matter how fast an observer is moving, they will always measure the speed of light to be the same, which has significant implications for the relativity of simultaneity. This is because the speed of light is used as a constant in equations that calculate time dilation and length contraction, which are effects of the relativity of simultaneity.

5. Can the relativity of simultaneity be applied to objects other than light?

Yes, the relativity of simultaneity can be applied to any object that travels at or near the speed of light. This includes subatomic particles, which have been observed to experience time dilation and length contraction at high speeds. However, these effects are negligible for objects moving at slower speeds and are only noticeable at speeds close to the speed of light.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
729
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
828
  • Special and General Relativity
7
Replies
221
Views
9K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
392
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
589
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
116
Views
6K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
481
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
Back
Top