Reminder on how to find eigenvectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter eherrtelle59
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvectors
eherrtelle59
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Ok everybody, it's been awhile since I've taken linear algebra. I need some help dusting off the cobwebs. (I'm trying to follow this in a paper; this isn't a homework question, but I'll be glad to move it...)

Let's say I have a matrix M = \begin{bmatrix}
-σ & σ & 0 \\[0.3em]
ρ & -1 & 0 \\[0.3em]
0 & 0 & -1
\end{bmatrix} \

Ok, now I want to find the eigenvectors (I've already found the eigenvalues.

These are λ_1=-1 and λ_2,3 = -(σ+1)/2 +/- ( (σ+1)^2 -4σ(1-ρ))^.5

Now, to find the eigenvectors, I solve these equations:

(-σ-λ)e_1 +σ e_2 =0
ρ e_1 +(-1-λ) e_2 =0
(-1-λ) e_3 =0

Now, I see that the eigenvector for λ_1 is ( 0 0 1).

Now I'm stuck. How do I find the eigenvectors for the other two?

The result in the paper I'm reading says

λ_2,3 = (σ σ+λ_2 0 ) , (σ σ+λ_3 0 )

I forget how to do this...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Essentially, just the way you did the first part, just much messier algebra!
 
Um...yes...

So, (-σ-λ)e_1 +σ e_2 =0

Looking at this and getting (σ+λ)e_1 =σ e_2, I would think the eigenvector is (σ+λ σ) not (σ+λ σ).
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top