Repeated Eigenvalues: How to Solve for a General Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues
Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12
This problem, and all the others on this homework assignment, are making me angry.

Homework Statement



Find the general solution of the system of equations.

...

x'=[-3 5/2; -5/2 2]x

Homework Equations



Just watch me solve

The Attempt at a Solution



Assume there's a solution x= $ert, where I'm denoting a vector with constant entries $.

----> (A-rI)=$
----> (A-rI) is singular
----> det(A-rI)=0
---->(-3-r)(2-r)-(-5/2)(5/2)=0
----> r= 1/2
---->(A-(1/2)I)$=(0 0)T

But then I have a problem because the only solution is $=(0 0)T.

I'd know how to proceed, were it not for this dilemma. Next I would Assume there's a second solution x=$tert + #ert, where # is another vector with constant entries, and then solve.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The solution to (-3-r)*(2-r)-(-5/2)*(5/2)=0 is r=(-1/2), isn't it? Not r=1/2.
 
Dick said:
The solution to (-3-r)*(2-r)-(-5/2)*(5/2)=0 is r=(-1/2), isn't it? Not r=1/2.

r2 + 3r - 2r -6 + 25/4 = 0
r2 + r + 1/4 = 0
(r+1/2)2=0
r= -1/2

D'oh!

(More than likely, I will some more questions about this assignment. Keep checking into this thread.)
 
Alright, Dick. Here is that other question I promised you.

I have a problem in the form x'=P(t)x + g(t), and P(t) just happens to be a singular matrix with constant entries. Therefor I can't do a transformation to the form y'= Dy + h(t).

Grrrrr! Now what?
 
If P were diagonal, then you could split it into two separate equations. The usual way to do this is to find a basis of R^2 where P is diagonal, then express x and g in terms of that basis and solve. You aren't being very specific here.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top