Representation equivalent to a unitary one

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A representation ρ of a group G is always equivalent to a unitary representation on some inner product space V, particularly for finite groups. The inner product can be defined as <u, v> = (1/|G|) ∑g∈G <ρ(g)u, ρ(g)v>, which remains invariant under the action of the group. This principle extends to compact Lie groups, such as SO(3), where integration over the group can be applied to establish a similar inner product structure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory and representations
  • Familiarity with inner product spaces
  • Knowledge of compact Lie groups
  • Basic concepts of invariant measures in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of the equivalence of representations in "Representation Theory: A First Course" by Fulton and Harris
  • Explore the properties of compact Lie groups in "Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Some of Their Applications" by Robert Gilmore
  • Learn about the construction of invariant inner products in representation theory
  • Research the specific representation theory of SO(3) in "Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals" by Richard Feynman
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying representation theory, particularly those focusing on group representations and their applications in quantum mechanics and theoretical physics.

Yoran91
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

How come a representation \rho of a group G is always equivalent to a unitary representation of G on some (inner product) space V ?

Can anyone provide a good source (book, preferably) which states a proof?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's only true for finite groups in general. You keep your representation and just define an inner product:
\left&lt; u, v \right&gt; = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \left&lt; \rho(g) u, \rho(g) v \right&gt;

And it's clear that this inner product is invariant under multiplying u and v by any \rho(h) because the right hand side will still end up being the sum over all group elements of \rho(gh) which still gives every \rho(g) once.

If you had a compact Lie group or something you could do the same thing with integrating over the group
 
Ok, so what if I had SO(3) ? It's supposed to hold for this group, but I can't seem to find a source (other than the lecture notes I'm using)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K