Representation equivalent to a unitary one

AI Thread Summary
A representation ρ of a group G can always be transformed into a unitary representation on an inner product space V, particularly for finite groups. The inner product can be defined using the average over the group elements, ensuring invariance under group actions. This method can also be applied to compact Lie groups, where integration over the group is utilized. The discussion highlights the specific case of the group SO(3) and the difficulty in finding a reliable source for this transformation. Overall, the equivalence of representations to unitary forms is affirmed, with a call for further literature on the topic.
Yoran91
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

How come a representation \rho of a group G is always equivalent to a unitary representation of G on some (inner product) space V ?

Can anyone provide a good source (book, preferably) which states a proof?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think it's only true for finite groups in general. You keep your representation and just define an inner product:
\left< u, v \right> = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \left< \rho(g) u, \rho(g) v \right>

And it's clear that this inner product is invariant under multiplying u and v by any \rho(h) because the right hand side will still end up being the sum over all group elements of \rho(gh) which still gives every \rho(g) once.

If you had a compact Lie group or something you could do the same thing with integrating over the group
 
Ok, so what if I had SO(3) ? It's supposed to hold for this group, but I can't seem to find a source (other than the lecture notes I'm using)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top