Representing a Function g:A2->B2 Using f:A->B: Quick Notation Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter jcsd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
AI Thread Summary
The function g:A2->B2 can be represented as g(x,y) = (f(x), f(y)), indicating that it takes a pair of inputs from A and outputs a pair in B. The notation gxg: AxA --> BxB is commonly understood to describe this relationship. This representation aligns with standard practices in function notation for Cartesian products. The discussion confirms that this notation is intuitive, even if not frequently seen in writing. Overall, the representation of g using f is straightforward and follows established conventions.
jcsd
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
13
Given the function f:A->B, what would be the usual way of representing the function g:A2->B2 where g(x,y) = (f(x),f(y))?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
usually gxg: AxA --> BxB would be well understood.
 
tahnks, I thought it was prolly something like that, though I hadn't seen it writtn before.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top