Rescoring Analytic Writing on GREs: What's the Verdict?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LocationX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Writing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effectiveness of requesting a rescore for the analytic writing section of the GRE. Participants express skepticism about the likelihood of significant score changes, noting that essays are evaluated by two readers using a standardized rubric, with a third reader involved if there is a large discrepancy. It is suggested that if rescoring consistently led to improved scores, more test-takers would pursue it. Additionally, there is a belief that many science and engineering programs may not heavily weigh writing scores, which could be reassuring for applicants with stronger backgrounds in math and science but lower writing scores. The average writing score for engineering students is mentioned as approximately 4.2, indicating a benchmark for applicants to aim for.
LocationX
Messages
141
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was wondering what was the general consensus on getting a rescore on the analytic writing part for the general GREs. Do people who get the rescore tend to get a better score? Or is it the other way around?

Thanks,
LX
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have any reason to believe that the first score wasn't fair? I kind of doubt that the scores would change much between readers because the readers use a rubric and your essay is read by two people who each give a score. If the scores are too far apart, then a third reader will decide the score so its a standard procedure. Also if the scores tended to improve on rescoring then everyone would do it.

I think most science/engineering programs are willing to overlook a bad writing score.
 
Really? Then that would be good news for me. As I have always been more computer, math and sci based in interests and grade results about a 3.5 gpa. I writing I am about a 2.7 gpa student.

But what kind of result are you both talking about. (Thanks Inadvance) -Ed.H
 
The average writing score for engineers is a 4.2 which is the average (I think) so aim to get that.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
390
Back
Top