Researching Set Theory as an Undergrad

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an undergraduate math student interested in pursuing research in set theory but facing challenges due to a lack of resources and faculty expertise at their liberal arts school. The student is currently enrolled in a naive set theory course and a philosophy course on non-classical logic, finding the latter more engaging. They seek guidance on how to prepare for research in set theory, including recommended texts and potential open problems to explore. Jech's "Set Theory" is acknowledged as a significant resource, though it is noted as too advanced for beginners. Instead, Hrbacek and Jech's book is suggested as a more suitable introduction. The importance of studying classical logic and model theory is also highlighted, as these areas are relevant to advanced set theory. The student plans to read Hrbacek and Jech's text before progressing to Jech's more comprehensive work.
mathkid
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm currently an undergrad in math who's going to graduate next year. I'm interested in doing research in set theory (not now of course, perhaps in grad school). Unfortunately, I'm at a liberal arts school and there are no set theorists in the math department. All they offer is a naiive set theory course, in fact I'm taking a philosophy course on non classical logic, which is more interesting than what the math department has to offer. I've asked my advisor and other professors at my university and they have no idea about what set theory research entails. So my question is, what do I have to do in order to be able to do research in set theory? I've heard that Jech's text "Set Theory" is a good text for set theory, so I'll probably read that over the summer. How do I prepare for doing research, and what are open problems and theory building to be done. I.e. I don't want to try to do stuff that has already been solved. Given that no one in my math department can answer these questions, it seems like I'll have to try to do the research by myself.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, Jech is probably the best text for set theory. But it is also a quite mature text. I would not recommend Jech for a first encounter in set theory. There is also the Hrbacek & Jech book, which is probably better suited for a first encounter: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0824779150/?tag=pfamazon01-20

You might also want to consider reading up on classical logic, more particularly: model theory. That will show up quite a lot in advanced set theory.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the advice mathwonk! I don't think I've seen model logic, except in the proof of the nullstellensatz, but I'll look that up for sure. I'll probably read, Hrbacek and Jech's text, and then work my way up to Jech's monster text.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
940
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top