Resistivity Ratios: Germanium Homework Statement

beesher
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(a) A sample of n-type Germanium contains 1023 ionized donors per cubic meter. Estimate the ratio at room temperature (300K) of the resistivity of this material to that of high purity intrinsic Germanium. The Electron hole product for Germanium is 1038m-6 and it can be assumed that the mobility of the electrons and the mobility of the electrons in the hole are similar at 300K.

(b) Suppose it takes an energy of 2eV to create a vacany in a certain solid. Show that the relative density of the vacanies of the atoms will always be less than 10-8 per cent unless the melting point is higher than 1000K.

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I thought since the electron hole product is 1038 then that gives:

Intrinsic - Ne=Nn = 1019
Extrinsic - Ne=1023 therefor Nn=1015

relitive resistivity can be given as PExtrinsic/PIntrinsic.

I'm not really sure how I continue from there. Do I disregard the mobilities because the are similiar?

(b) I'm really unsure how to complete (b), I think it might be something to do with manipulation of n=Ne-E/kT.

Any help would be much appreciated
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top