Resolving a Complex Identity: Collaborative Proof Approach

  • Thread starter Thread starter Orion1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Proof
Orion1
Messages
961
Reaction score
3


I am having difficulty symbolically resolving the LHS of this identity algebraically:

\frac{r}{2} \left[ \left(8 \pi P(r) + \frac{1}{r^2} \right) \frac{r}{r - 2u} - \frac{1}{r^2} \right] = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}

\left(4 \pi r P(r) + \frac{1}{2r} \right) \frac{r}{r - 2u} - \frac{1}{2r} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}

\left( 4 \pi r^2 P(r) + \frac{1}{2} \right) \frac{1}{r - 2u} - \frac{1}{2r} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}

\frac{4 \pi r^2 P(r)}{r-2 u}+\frac{1}{2 (r-2 u)}-\frac{1}{2 r} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}

Any collaboration would be greatly appreciated.

[/Color]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org

Attempt to resolve LHS with RHS:
\frac{4 \pi r^2 P(r)}{r-2 u}+\frac{1}{2 (r-2 u)}-\frac{1}{2 r} = \frac{4 \pi r^2 P(r)}{r - 2u} + \frac{u}{r(r - 2u)}

Identity:
\frac{1}{2 (r-2 u)}-\frac{1}{2 r} = \frac{u}{r(r - 2u)}

Factor:
\frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{1}{r - 2u} - \frac{1}{r} \right) = \frac{u}{r(r - 2u)}
u = \frac{r(r - 2u)}{2} \left( \frac{1}{r - 2u} - \frac{1}{r} \right)
\frac{1}{2} [r - (r - 2u )] = u
u = u

Resigned.
[/Color]
 
Last edited:
Orion1 said:
I am having difficulty symbolically resolving the LHS of this identity algebraically:

\frac{r}{2} \left[ \left(8 \pi P(r) + \frac{1}{r^2} \right) \frac{r}{r - 2u} - \frac{1}{r^2} \right] = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}

\left(4 \pi r P(r) + \frac{1}{2r} \right) \frac{r}{r - 2u} - \frac{1}{2r} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}

\left( 4 \pi r^2 P(r) + \frac{1}{2} \right) \frac{1}{r - 2u} - \frac{1}{2r} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}

\frac{4 \pi r^2 P(r)}{r-2 u}+\frac{1}{2 (r-2 u)}-\frac{1}{2 r} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}

Any collaboration would be greatly appreciated.

[/Color]

Put the left-hand side over a common denominator. You're nearly there!
 
Orion1 said:
Attempt to resolve LHS with RHS:
...
Identity:
...
Factor:
...
Resigned.
Why resign? In the domain where your steps were reversible, doesn't reversing your steps do exactly what you want?
 

LHS over common denomonator:
\frac{8 \pi r^3 P(r)}{2r (r-2 u)}+\frac{r}{2r (r - 2 u)}-\frac{r - 2u}{2 r(r - 2u)} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}

\frac{8 \pi r^3 P(r) + r - (r - 2u)}{2 r(r - 2u)} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}

\frac{8 \pi r^3 P(r) + 2 u}{2 r (r-2 u)} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}

\boxed{\frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}}
[/Color]

Hurkyl said:
doesn't reversing your steps do exactly what you want?
[/Color]

Affirmative, there was nothing left to prove at that point, hence resign. However the LHS common denominator proof approach is what I was searching for.

Thanks johnshade, you just helped me solve a PHD level equation!
[/Color]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
835
Back
Top