Resolving reactant forces on supported beams.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adrian Haddock
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beams Forces
AI Thread Summary
A uniform plank weighing 120N is supported by two stools with an additional weight of 80N placed in the middle. The equilibrium conditions lead to the calculation of forces acting on each stool, with the book stating stool A has 48N and stool B has 72N. However, calculations using moments show that the correct forces should be 88N for stool A and 112N for stool B. The discussion emphasizes the importance of taking moments of all components separately rather than finding the center of mass, leading to agreement on the revised answers. The original book answers are suggested to be an editing error.
Adrian Haddock
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The questions States.

A uniform plank of weight 120N rests on two stools. a weight of 80N is placed on the plank, midway between the stools calculate

A) the force acting on stool A
B) the force acting on stool B
(Cant add a picture for some reason.)

Plank over length = 4.0m
from left hand edge to stool A = 0.5m
from right hand edge to stool B = 1.0m

The answers in the book state
A)48N
b)72N

I know the plank is in equilibrium so Σ M = 0 and Σ F = 0
I know a moment is F * d

My attempt.
I calculated the centre of mass via moments from the left hand side.

as in (m1*d1 + m2*d2)/m1+m2

so distance of the 80N mass is 1.75m
centre of the uniform plank is 120N at 2m.

put those into the above sum i get the effective centre to be at 1.9m. I think i can say this system is the same as a 200N force acting at 1.9m.

Is this correct?
Do I need to work out fro the over hangs?

The answers i get are Ra = 112N and Rb = 88N

by taking a 200N force acting at 1.9m and taking Moments about stool A...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Adrian Haddock said:
The answers i get are Ra = 112N and Rb = 88N
Not the other way around?
 
Yes, quite right. Ra=88N and Rb = 112N
 
Adrian Haddock said:
Yes, quite right. Ra=88N and Rb = 112N
Looks good.
I would not have bothered finding the mass centre. Simpler just to take moments of all the components separately.
 
I did that also, got the same answers.

If someone else agrees with me, I'll put the answers in the book down to an editting mishap and move on worth my life, same I can't put the hair I pulled out back into my head.

Thank you for your help.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top