Resonant Frequency of Open Ended Pipes with a Barrier Imposed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impact of a barrier placed at varying distances from an open-ended pipe on its resonant frequency. Experimentation indicates that as the barrier approaches the pipe, the resonant frequency decreases, while increasing distance results in a frequency increase until it stabilizes. Theoretical insights suggest that the barrier acts like a mirror for sound waves, creating interference patterns that depend on the distance and frequency. Coupling effects and phase shifts are crucial in understanding this phenomenon, with implications for how the system behaves as the barrier nears the pipe. The conversation highlights the complexity of the physics involved, particularly in relation to harmonics and standing wave patterns.
Twenty_Three
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was just wondering if anyone here had any experience with an open pipe system with a barrier imposed.

Basically, say for a pipe open at both ends, at one end we place a barrier a distance away from the pipe. How would this affect the resonant frequency of the pipe?

From experimentation, results I've gotten show that as the barrier distance decreased, the resonant frequency decreases as well. Likewise as the barrier distance increases, the resonant frequency increases until the point where the barrier has no effect where resonant frequency of pipe levels out.

Does anyone have any idea about the theory behind this? The air particle movement, radiation impedance, free fields, some key terms that I could research (seeing as I'm stuck at the moment on how to explain this phenomena).

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of the barrier as a mirror to sound waves. A barrier some distance from the end will behave like having two tubes end to end with a space twice that distance. Far apart they can be in sync without interfering. As they grow closer the waves exiting one's end interferes with the standing wave of the other. This will be a function of distance and freq. The coupling will be proportional to square of the distance and phase shift is distance times freq over speed of sound. (plus a half cycle phase shift due to reflection)

In the boundary case where the two tubes meet you have an open tube of double length at a harmonic where there is a node at mid point or equivalently your original tube becomes closed on that end.

This looks like a great physics problem. What is your interest?
 
jambaugh said:
Think of the barrier as a mirror to sound waves. A barrier some distance from the end will behave like having two tubes end to end with a space twice that distance. Far apart they can be in sync without interfering. As they grow closer the waves exiting one's end interferes with the standing wave of the other. This will be a function of distance and freq. The coupling will be proportional to square of the distance and phase shift is distance times freq over speed of sound. (plus a half cycle phase shift due to reflection)

In the boundary case where the two tubes meet you have an open tube of double length at a harmonic where there is a node at mid point or equivalently your original tube becomes closed on that end.

This looks like a great physics problem. What is your interest?

Hello Jambaugh,

Thanks for your reply, I'm actually doing this investigation as part of a high school assignment, although I may've bitten off more than I can chew.

The coupling will be proportional to square of the distance and phase shift is distance times freq over speed of sound. (plus a half cycle phase shift due to reflection)

^Would that be referring to N = (D^2f)/4v? What do you mean by the coupling, I'm still slightly puzzled with this. The results I've obtained was that for an open pipes of around 60cmish (excluding end correction), the resonant frequency with the barrier at a distance of 1cm varies only by 2Hz to that of 8cm (where the resonant frequency levels out).

In the boundary case where the two tubes meet you have an open tube of double length at a harmonic where there is a node at mid point or equivalently your original tube becomes closed on that end.

^That's what I was thinking at first, on our spectrum we were getting a really tiny peak at half the loudest peak, which we believe is actually an undertone as opposed to the fundamental. That's why I'm not quite sure as to whether it equates to the tube being closed at one end.

Thanks again for your response :)
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top