Results of last year's CDT prediction poll

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Poll Prediction
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
the results in this case are very simple. Over a dozen of us guessed
as to whether (understood "in a reasonable time") Loll's team would be able to extend the sum-over-topologies result from 2D to 3D and ultimately to 4D.

Of the 12 people who registered a forecast, and are still forum members, two got it right: Hans de Vries and Kea.

they said Loll's group would not be able to extend the results, even to 3D.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=81626

In the most recent CDT survey paper this is discussed a little. some reasons for the stubborn resistance of the problem are mentioned. It has been 10 months since the last paper on toplogy change in CDT and no sign progress. for all practical purposes, as I see it, it has been a reasonable time to wait and Hans and Kea predicted right.

==================

It may be of some consolation to others that a completely different bunch of people won the OTHER prediction poll we had last year that we have results for
https://www.physicsforums.com/poll.php?do=showresults&pollid=580
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=81739

In that case 14 or so guessed who are still around and the winners (whose names I recognize)
were Chronos, Notevenwrong, Gokul, and Ohwilleke.

there is one odd thing. the only person who won both polls was someone who I think was banned from PF! His tag is Spin Network. I have not been counting him because he is no longer a member. But from the limited evidence available I would consider him an inspired guesser.

==================
a recent CDT survey is here
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0604212
see page 4 and references there for discussion of the recalcitrant "sum over topologies" problem
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like Hans de Vries and Kea were right in their prediction that Loll's team would not be able to extend the results, even to 3D, within a reasonable timeframe. It is interesting that the only person who won both predictions was someone who has since been banned from the forum. It is a testament to his investigative skills that he was able to make such accurate guesses on two different topics.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top