No! First off - more does not equal better. People kill themselves regularly using medicines, insecticides, and so on with the idea "if one ml is good 20 ml must be great,
so 500 ml is beyond wonderful".
Currrently no toxic effects have been shown for resveratrol. However, there have been no real dose/response studies that I can find. Probably because nobody is entirely sure of what effects to look for. Some current thinking is to measure oxygen utilization (aerobic capacity), because of the idea of the
mitochondrial theory of aging. ie.,
mitochondria "burn out" and become less effective, and so use less O2. There have been studies of this effect with mice:
Lagouge M., et al. 2006
Resveratrol improves
mitochondrial function and protects against metabolic
disease by activating SIRT1 and PGC-1 alpha. Cell. 2006 Dec 15;127(6):1109-22.
Among other things, they measured O2 uptake into tissues (which indirectly measures how fast aerobic respiration goes on). It is called aerobic capacity. Once a cell is "firing on all cylinders" in terms of mitchondria, a maximum level of 02 uptake occurs. So, adding resveratrol beyond that limit is not going to help anything - in terms of this experiment, anyway. Or probably in terms of mouse longevity or whatever else you are interested in.
Resveratrol is a stilbene that is produced by some plants usually in repsonse to a fungal assault. Don't go taking dozens of resveratrol pills at a time, using your 'more is better' logic. There are studies on humans with regard to other phtyo-antioxidants that demonstrate detrimental effects with increased levels of consumption.
Unforturnately, resveratrol can be made in the lab, so the pill-people are pushing it big time. Ignore the hype.