How is the 130479.79 Value Calculated in this Retirement Calculator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brian110872
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculator
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of a retirement savings value of 130,479.79, which is derived from a formula involving withdrawals and interest over five years. Participants explain that the calculation uses a formula for future value with simple interest, factoring in annual withdrawals of $30,000 at a 7.5% interest rate. The equation 1.075^5(X) = 30,000(5.808) is highlighted, leading to a solution for the initial amount needed, X. There is some confusion regarding the precise value obtained, with users discussing minor discrepancies in their calculations. The conversation emphasizes understanding the underlying math to accurately determine retirement savings requirements.
brian110872
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
On this chart:
http://www.banksite.com/calc/retire?with=30000&lngt=5&lngt=5&pay2=0.0&intr=7.5&outt=HTML+Tables
how did they calculate 130479.79? I know how they got the "Interest" and "End Bal" just not the 130479.79. Anyone have any suggestions?
Here is the original form:
http://www.banksite.com/calc/retire

Thank You,
Brian
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In this example, the objective is to be able to withdraw $30,000 per year from savings. It assumes 7.5% interest (it's obviously very old!). The "end balance" is, of course,0 by definition.

Suppose you had X dollars in the bank, drawing 7.5% simple interest.
After 1 year, before you withdraw anything, you would have the original X plus interest, (0.075)(30000) or a total of (1+ 0.075)X= 1.075X. Now, you withdraw 30000. You have 1.075X- 30000 left.

For the second year, repeat that with initial amount 1.075X-30000. Before withdrawing anything, but including interest, you would have
1.075(1.075X- 30000)= (1.075)2X- (1.075)(30000). After withdrawing your 30000 you will have (1.075)2X- (1.075)(30000)- 30000 left.

For the third year, you are starting with that amount so, before withdrawal you would have 1.075((1.075)2X- 1.075(30000)- 30000)= 1.0753X- 1.0752300000- 1.075(30000). Now withdraw 30000 from that: 1.0753X- 1.0752300000- (1.075)30000- 30000= 1.0753X- 30000(1+ 1.075+ 1.0752.

Do you see the pattern? After n years you will have 1.075nX- (30000)(1+ 1.075+ ...+ 1.075n-1. In particular, after 5 years you would have 1.0755X- (30000)(1+ 1.075+ 1.0752+ 1.0753+ 1.0754. Since in this example you are apparently only expecting to die 5 years after retirement, after 5 years, the "final balance" is to be 0. It's not that hard to calculate that 1+ 1.075+ 1.0752+ 1.0753+ 1.0754= 5.808 approximately. Solve the equation 1.0755X= 30000(5.808). I get slightly less than 130480. Try deducting the 30000 before adding the interest. That would be the same as replacing X by X-30000.
 
Thanks for the reply HallsofIvy. For 1.075^5(X)= 30000(5.808), I'm getting X=121368. How am I miscalculating?
 
brian110872 said:
Thanks for the reply HallsofIvy. For 1.075^5(X)= 30000(5.808), I'm getting X=121368. How am I miscalculating?
You're not, you've solved for x almost perfectly, actually your missing a few decimal places there, can I assume you are using mathematica?
 
Zurtex said:
You're not, you've solved for x almost perfectly, actually your missing a few decimal places there, can I assume you are using mathematica?
What is mathematica?
 
HallsofIvy,
I'm not sure how you got 130480 from 1.0755X= 30000(5.808).

Thank You,
Brian
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top