Reversing Babbleonian Knonsense: A Global Challenge

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andre
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the confusion of language stemming from the biblical story of the Tower of Babel, highlighting the challenges of pronunciation in different languages. An example is given with the name "Knut," which is pronounced as 'noot' in German, contrasting with the expected English pronunciation. The conversation then shifts to the idea of reforming English spelling to eliminate inconsistencies and improve clarity. Suggestions include dropping letters like "c," "x," and "y," and replacing them with more phonetically consistent alternatives. The proposed reforms aim to create a more logical and coherent spelling system over a period of years, reflecting a desire to simplify language amidst globalization and linguistic confusion.
Andre
Messages
4,294
Reaction score
73
According to biblian myth the languages of the people got confused while building the Tower of Babel

And sure enough it was very confusing to learn that "know" was not pronounced KKKno but like 'no', ignoring the k, Babelonian language confusion.

Then I just happened to bump into this youtube,



Sad, but what struck me is that Knut was pronounced as 'noot' rather than KKKnoot or perhaps Canoot, if it's too hard to recognize a 'k' before an 'n'. The way the Germans named him and how it should be pronounced.

With the growing globalisation, is there any way we can reverse this process of babbleonian knonsense?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
is there any way we can reverse this process of babbleonian knonsense?

And go agaiknst god's will? You blasphemy!
 
Knife.
Perhaps it should be "Nife"
Why the letter K... makes no sense.
Maybe it just looks good. Who knows.
 
I post this from time to time.
Mark Twain (attributed) said:
A Plan for the Improvement of English Spelling
For example, in Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped to be replased either by "k" or "s," and likewise "x" would no longer be part of the alphabet. The only kase in which "c" would be retained would be the "ch" formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2 might reform "w" spelling, so that "which" and "one" would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish "y" replasing it with "i" and Iear 4 might fiks the "g / j" anomali wonse and for all.

Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear with Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants. Bai Iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez "c," "y," and "x" - bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez - tu riplais "ch," "sh," and "th" rispektivli.

Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld.
 
Hi you all! I married into the Twain famila. :!)
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...

Similar threads

2
Replies
67
Views
14K
Replies
2
Views
502K
Back
Top