Reviewing How to Find Complex Roots: e.g. x3= 8

  • Thread starter Thread starter BloodyFrozen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Roots
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding complex roots for the equation x^3 = 8, highlighting the application of De Moivre's formula and polar coordinates. The roots identified are 2, -1 + i√3, and -1 - i√3, with the method involving converting the equation into polar form and using the properties of complex numbers. Polynomial division is also mentioned as a technique to find roots, confirming that x = 2 is a root and leading to a quadratic equation for the other roots. The conversation emphasizes the utility of expressing complex numbers in exponential form for easier calculations. Understanding these methods is essential for effectively finding complex roots in algebra.
BloodyFrozen
Messages
353
Reaction score
1
Does anyone know where I can review finding complex roots?

For example, x3= 8

I know the roots are 2, -1+isqrt(3), and -1-isqrt(3), but I can't remember how to figure it out.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi BloodyFrozen! :smile:

Let me give you the method. The trick is to apply De Moivre's formula. So, the first this to do is to write the complex numbers in polar coordinates. That is

z^3=8

becomes

(r(\cos(\theta)+i\sin(theta)))^3=8(\cos(0)+\sin(0))

By De Moivre, we get

r^3(\cos(3\theta)+i\sin(3\theta))=8(\cos(0)+\sin(0))

So we get that

r^3=8,~\cos(3\theta)=\cos(0),~\sin(3\theta)=\sin(0)

So

r=2, \theta=2\pi k/3~\text{for k an integer}

Hence,

z=2(\cos(2\pi k/3)+i\sin(2\pi k/3).

Thus z=2 if k=0, z=-1+i\sqrt{3} for k=1 and z=-1-\sqrt{3} for k=2. Any other value of k will yield the same values.
 
BloodyFrozen said:
Does anyone know where I can review finding complex roots?

For example, x3= 8

I know the roots are 2, -1+isqrt(3), and -1-isqrt(3), but I can't remember how to figure it out.

X^3 - 8 = 0

By inspection, x = 2 is a root.

(x^3 - 8) / (x-2) = x^2 + 2x + 4, a quadratic that gives the other two roots.
 
Thanks both:)
micromass:That's what I was looking for
Steve:Ahh, right... can't forget about poly division:P
 
<br /> \begin{eqnarray*}<br /> 8 &amp; = &amp; 2^3 e^0 &amp;|&amp; 2^3 e^{2\pi i} &amp;|&amp; 2^3 e^{4\pi i} \\<br /> 8^{\frac{1}{3}} &amp; = &amp; 2 e^0 &amp;|&amp; 2 e^{\frac{2\pi i}{3}} &amp;|&amp; 2 e^{\frac{4\pi i}{3}} \\<br /> &amp; = &amp; 2 &amp;|&amp; 2\left(\cos\left(\frac{2\pi}{3}\right) + i\sin\left(\frac{2\pi}{3}\right)\right) &amp;|&amp; 2\left(\cos\left(\frac{4\pi}{3}\right) + i\sin\left(\frac{4\pi}{3}\right)\right) \\<br /> &amp; = &amp; 2 &amp;|&amp; 2\left(-\frac{1}{2} + i\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\right) &amp;|&amp; 2\left(-\frac{1}{2} - i\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\right) \\<br /> &amp; = &amp; 2 &amp;|&amp; -1 + i\sqrt{3} &amp;|&amp; -1 - i\sqrt{3} \\<br /> \end{eqnarray*}<br />
This is basically what micromass did, but I find it easier to remember by explicitly writing it as a complex exponential. In fact, for many purposes you can stop at step 2 -- 2 e^{\frac{2\pi i}{3}} is likely to be as useful or more than -1 + i\sqrt{3}.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top