Reviews of “Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity”

  • Context: Relativity 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Review
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around reviews and evaluations of James B. Hartle's book, “Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity.” Participants explore its suitability for self-study, prerequisites for understanding the material, and the accessibility of the content.

Discussion Character

  • Review/Rating, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Hartle's book is one of the most accessible introductions to General Relativity (GR) and potentially the best for self-study.
  • It is noted that a thorough understanding of Special Relativity (SR) is a significant prerequisite for reading the book, although Hartle revises SR within the text.
  • There is a consensus that while the book attempts to minimize mathematical complexity, it still requires familiarity with advanced undergraduate mathematics.
  • One participant expresses gratitude for the insights shared regarding the book's accessibility and prerequisites.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the accessibility of the book for self-study and the importance of having a solid grasp of SR. However, there is no explicit consensus on the adequacy of Hartle's revision of SR as a standalone preparation.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
TL;DR Summary: Review/Rating of “Gravity … … “ by James B. Hartle

Thoughts regarding prerequisites for reading this book

I would be really grateful if someone would rate/evaluate/review James B. Hartle’z book, “Gravity: An introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity”

Would the book be suitable for self study … especially given that James Hartle has provided a free solutions manual of 389 pages … which includes solutions to all problems in his book!!!

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's probably the most accessible serious introduction to GR. And possibly the best for self-study. GR, however, is not an easy subject. The main prerequisite is to have a really thorough grasp of SR. Hartle revises SR in the book, but I don't think that's enough by itself. And, although Hartle goes as light as possible on the mathematics, the book still requires familiarity with advanced undergraduate mathematics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, dextercioby, Math Amateur and 1 other person
PeroK said:
And possibly the best for self-study.

Oh yes, I agree with that. It's a great book.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
PeroK said:
It's probably the most accessible serious introduction to GR. And possibly the best for self-study. GR, however, is not an easy subject. The main prerequisite is to have a really thorough grasp of SR. Hartle revises SR in the book, but I don't think that's enough by itself. And, although Hartle goes as light as possible on the mathematics, the book still requires familiarity with advanced undergraduate mathematics.
Thanks so much, PeroK .... that is most helpful ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
401
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K