Relativity Reviews of “Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity”

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Review
Click For Summary
James B. Hartle's book "Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity" is highly regarded as one of the most accessible introductions to general relativity (GR), making it suitable for self-study. However, a solid understanding of special relativity (SR) is essential, as the book revises SR but does not cover it in depth. Additionally, readers should be familiar with advanced undergraduate mathematics, as the book, while minimizing mathematical complexity, still requires a certain level of mathematical proficiency. The inclusion of a free 389-page solutions manual enhances its value for self-learners.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
TL;DR Summary: Review/Rating of “Gravity … … “ by James B. Hartle

Thoughts regarding prerequisites for reading this book

I would be really grateful if someone would rate/evaluate/review James B. Hartle’z book, “Gravity: An introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity”

Would the book be suitable for self study … especially given that James Hartle has provided a free solutions manual of 389 pages … which includes solutions to all problems in his book!!!

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's probably the most accessible serious introduction to GR. And possibly the best for self-study. GR, however, is not an easy subject. The main prerequisite is to have a really thorough grasp of SR. Hartle revises SR in the book, but I don't think that's enough by itself. And, although Hartle goes as light as possible on the mathematics, the book still requires familiarity with advanced undergraduate mathematics.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron, dextercioby, Math Amateur and 1 other person
PeroK said:
And possibly the best for self-study.

Oh yes, I agree with that. It's a great book.
 
PeroK said:
It's probably the most accessible serious introduction to GR. And possibly the best for self-study. GR, however, is not an easy subject. The main prerequisite is to have a really thorough grasp of SR. Hartle revises SR in the book, but I don't think that's enough by itself. And, although Hartle goes as light as possible on the mathematics, the book still requires familiarity with advanced undergraduate mathematics.
Thanks so much, PeroK .... that is most helpful ...

Peter
 
Im currently reading mathematics for physicists by Philippe Dennery and André Krzywicki, and I’m understanding most concepts however I think it would be better for me to get a book on complex analysis or calculus to better understand it so I’m not left looking at an equation for an hour trying to figure out what it means. So here comes the split, do I get a complex analysis book? Or a calculus book? I might be able to Borrow a calculus textbook from my math teacher study that for a bit and...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K