Relativity Reviews of “Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity”

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Review
AI Thread Summary
James B. Hartle's book "Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity" is highly regarded as one of the most accessible introductions to general relativity (GR), making it suitable for self-study. However, a solid understanding of special relativity (SR) is essential, as the book revises SR but does not cover it in depth. Additionally, readers should be familiar with advanced undergraduate mathematics, as the book, while minimizing mathematical complexity, still requires a certain level of mathematical proficiency. The inclusion of a free 389-page solutions manual enhances its value for self-learners.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
TL;DR Summary: Review/Rating of “Gravity … … “ by James B. Hartle

Thoughts regarding prerequisites for reading this book

I would be really grateful if someone would rate/evaluate/review James B. Hartle’z book, “Gravity: An introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity”

Would the book be suitable for self study … especially given that James Hartle has provided a free solutions manual of 389 pages … which includes solutions to all problems in his book!!!

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's probably the most accessible serious introduction to GR. And possibly the best for self-study. GR, however, is not an easy subject. The main prerequisite is to have a really thorough grasp of SR. Hartle revises SR in the book, but I don't think that's enough by itself. And, although Hartle goes as light as possible on the mathematics, the book still requires familiarity with advanced undergraduate mathematics.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron, dextercioby, Math Amateur and 1 other person
PeroK said:
And possibly the best for self-study.

Oh yes, I agree with that. It's a great book.
 
PeroK said:
It's probably the most accessible serious introduction to GR. And possibly the best for self-study. GR, however, is not an easy subject. The main prerequisite is to have a really thorough grasp of SR. Hartle revises SR in the book, but I don't think that's enough by itself. And, although Hartle goes as light as possible on the mathematics, the book still requires familiarity with advanced undergraduate mathematics.
Thanks so much, PeroK .... that is most helpful ...

Peter
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top