Relativity Reviews of “Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity”

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Review
AI Thread Summary
James B. Hartle's book "Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity" is highly regarded as one of the most accessible introductions to general relativity (GR), making it suitable for self-study. However, a solid understanding of special relativity (SR) is essential, as the book revises SR but does not cover it in depth. Additionally, readers should be familiar with advanced undergraduate mathematics, as the book, while minimizing mathematical complexity, still requires a certain level of mathematical proficiency. The inclusion of a free 389-page solutions manual enhances its value for self-learners.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
TL;DR Summary: Review/Rating of “Gravity … … “ by James B. Hartle

Thoughts regarding prerequisites for reading this book

I would be really grateful if someone would rate/evaluate/review James B. Hartle’z book, “Gravity: An introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity”

Would the book be suitable for self study … especially given that James Hartle has provided a free solutions manual of 389 pages … which includes solutions to all problems in his book!!!

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's probably the most accessible serious introduction to GR. And possibly the best for self-study. GR, however, is not an easy subject. The main prerequisite is to have a really thorough grasp of SR. Hartle revises SR in the book, but I don't think that's enough by itself. And, although Hartle goes as light as possible on the mathematics, the book still requires familiarity with advanced undergraduate mathematics.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron, dextercioby, Math Amateur and 1 other person
PeroK said:
And possibly the best for self-study.

Oh yes, I agree with that. It's a great book.
 
PeroK said:
It's probably the most accessible serious introduction to GR. And possibly the best for self-study. GR, however, is not an easy subject. The main prerequisite is to have a really thorough grasp of SR. Hartle revises SR in the book, but I don't think that's enough by itself. And, although Hartle goes as light as possible on the mathematics, the book still requires familiarity with advanced undergraduate mathematics.
Thanks so much, PeroK .... that is most helpful ...

Peter
 
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top