RF Susceptor Heating (KHz range) Graphite Foil vs Iron Foil (or thin film)

AI Thread Summary
For low temperature RF heating susceptors, expanded graphite foil is noted for its excellent thermal conductance, providing even heating across surfaces. However, the discussion highlights a lack of comparative information on susceptance properties in specific geometries and conditions, particularly for areas smaller than 10 sq/in and foils under 2mm thick. The system operates at a maximum of 100W, raising questions about optimal material choices for efficiency. Participants are encouraged to share any new findings or rephrase the inquiry for better engagement. The need for more detailed analysis in this area remains evident.
Watson
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Which do you believe is the best choice for a low temperature RF heating susceptor, i.e. - greatest rise in temperature vs. field strength. I am aware that Graphite (expanded graphite foil) has excellent thermal conductance in plane and therefore makes for very even heating patterns over large areas, however I am dealing with areas no larger than 10 sq/in.

I have not found much information comparing the susceptance properties of the two in similar geometries, frequencies and field strengths. Foils generally <2mm thickness. The system wattage does not exceed 100W.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...

Similar threads

Back
Top