RG flow of quadrupole coupling in 6+1 dimension electrostatic problem

DaniV
Messages
31
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Given a classical action which describes electrostatics in 6+1 dimensions
$$\frac{S_\text{eff}}{T}=\frac{1}{2} \int d^6x(\nabla\phi)^2+\frac{S_{p.p}}{T}$$

where the one particle action, that represents the energy of the monopole dipole and quadrupole induced by charge distribution around the origin is:

$$\frac{S_{p.p}}{T}=-q\phi(0)-D\nabla_i\phi(0)\nabla^i\phi(0)-Q\nabla_i\nabla_j\phi(0)\nabla^i\nabla^j\phi(0)+...$$

Now we add to the theory a scalar field ##\sigma## that couples to the potential ##\phi## so the action becomes:

$$\frac{S_\text{eff}}{T}=\int d^6x\left[(\nabla \phi)^2+(\nabla \sigma)^2+\lambda\sigma (\nabla \phi)^2\right]+\frac{S_{p.p}}{T}$$

and the system is subjected to an external quadrupole background $$\bar \phi=\frac{1}{2}\rho_{ij}x^ix^j$$ when ##Tr\rho_{ij}=0##
i.e. ##\phi \to \phi+ \bar \phi## where ##\phi## describes the classical response of the charge distribution at the origin to the external perturbation ##\bar \phi##, and we assume that ##\frac{q^2\lambda^2}{Q^2}\ll1##

I want to calculate the RG flow of the coupling ##Q##,
using Minimal subtraction renormalization scheme and dimensional regularization.
Relevant Equations
Euler Lagrange for fields:
$$\frac{\partial \mathcal L}{\partial \phi}=\partial_{\mu}(\frac{\partial \mathcal L}{\partial (\partial _{\mu}\phi)})$$

dimensional regularization:
we put $$2\epsilon=d-4$$ when d is the dimension , solving divergent integrals by expanding to small ##\epsilon## and then as we approach to final result we take ##\epsilon \to 0##

Minimal subtraction renormalization scheme:
defining new couplings using the old ones in way that they cancel divergent part of the solution.

RG flow:
the flow of the coupling constant in the dependence of energy scale ##\mu## given by the beta function ##\beta(Q)=\mu \frac{\partial Q}{\partial \mu}##
I tried to do a Euler Lagrange equation to our Lagrangian:
$$\frac{S_\text{eff}}{T}=\int d^6x\left[(\nabla \phi)^2+(\nabla \sigma)^2+\lambda\sigma (\nabla \phi)^2\right]+\frac{S_{p.p}}{T}$$
and then I would like to solve the equation using perturbation theory when ##Q## or somehow $$\frac{q^2\lambda^2}{Q^2}\ll1$$ but when itried to do the equation I got that is not depend on Q at all because the relevant term in $$S_{p.p}$$ is just derivatives of the field $\phi$ in the point zero (so its acting like constant) or am I wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A:To do the Euler-Lagrange equation, you need to take derivative of the action with respect to the respective fields. The only term containing $\lambda$ is the second one, so we will concentrate there. $$\delta S = \int d^6x \left[2\lambda \sigma \nabla \cdot \phi \delta \nabla \phi + \lambda \sigma (\nabla \phi)^2 \delta \sigma \right]$$We can use integration by parts on the first term and use the fact that the field is periodic to obtain$$\delta S = \int d^6x \left[-2\lambda \phi \nabla \cdot \sigma \delta \nabla \phi + \lambda \sigma (\nabla \phi)^2 \delta \sigma \right]$$Integrating the first term by parts again, and using periodicity of the field again, we obtain$$\delta S = \int d^6x \left[2\lambda \phi \nabla^2 \sigma \delta \phi + \lambda \sigma (\nabla \phi)^2 \delta \sigma \right]$$The Euler-Lagrange equation then is$$\nabla^2 \sigma = 0$$$$\nabla^2 \phi - \lambda \sigma (\nabla \phi)^2 = 0$$These equations are independent of $Q$.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top