RG flow of quadrupole coupling in 6+1 dimension electrostatic problem

DaniV
Messages
31
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Given a classical action which describes electrostatics in 6+1 dimensions
$$\frac{S_\text{eff}}{T}=\frac{1}{2} \int d^6x(\nabla\phi)^2+\frac{S_{p.p}}{T}$$

where the one particle action, that represents the energy of the monopole dipole and quadrupole induced by charge distribution around the origin is:

$$\frac{S_{p.p}}{T}=-q\phi(0)-D\nabla_i\phi(0)\nabla^i\phi(0)-Q\nabla_i\nabla_j\phi(0)\nabla^i\nabla^j\phi(0)+...$$

Now we add to the theory a scalar field ##\sigma## that couples to the potential ##\phi## so the action becomes:

$$\frac{S_\text{eff}}{T}=\int d^6x\left[(\nabla \phi)^2+(\nabla \sigma)^2+\lambda\sigma (\nabla \phi)^2\right]+\frac{S_{p.p}}{T}$$

and the system is subjected to an external quadrupole background $$\bar \phi=\frac{1}{2}\rho_{ij}x^ix^j$$ when ##Tr\rho_{ij}=0##
i.e. ##\phi \to \phi+ \bar \phi## where ##\phi## describes the classical response of the charge distribution at the origin to the external perturbation ##\bar \phi##, and we assume that ##\frac{q^2\lambda^2}{Q^2}\ll1##

I want to calculate the RG flow of the coupling ##Q##,
using Minimal subtraction renormalization scheme and dimensional regularization.
Relevant Equations
Euler Lagrange for fields:
$$\frac{\partial \mathcal L}{\partial \phi}=\partial_{\mu}(\frac{\partial \mathcal L}{\partial (\partial _{\mu}\phi)})$$

dimensional regularization:
we put $$2\epsilon=d-4$$ when d is the dimension , solving divergent integrals by expanding to small ##\epsilon## and then as we approach to final result we take ##\epsilon \to 0##

Minimal subtraction renormalization scheme:
defining new couplings using the old ones in way that they cancel divergent part of the solution.

RG flow:
the flow of the coupling constant in the dependence of energy scale ##\mu## given by the beta function ##\beta(Q)=\mu \frac{\partial Q}{\partial \mu}##
I tried to do a Euler Lagrange equation to our Lagrangian:
$$\frac{S_\text{eff}}{T}=\int d^6x\left[(\nabla \phi)^2+(\nabla \sigma)^2+\lambda\sigma (\nabla \phi)^2\right]+\frac{S_{p.p}}{T}$$
and then I would like to solve the equation using perturbation theory when ##Q## or somehow $$\frac{q^2\lambda^2}{Q^2}\ll1$$ but when itried to do the equation I got that is not depend on Q at all because the relevant term in $$S_{p.p}$$ is just derivatives of the field $\phi$ in the point zero (so its acting like constant) or am I wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A:To do the Euler-Lagrange equation, you need to take derivative of the action with respect to the respective fields. The only term containing $\lambda$ is the second one, so we will concentrate there. $$\delta S = \int d^6x \left[2\lambda \sigma \nabla \cdot \phi \delta \nabla \phi + \lambda \sigma (\nabla \phi)^2 \delta \sigma \right]$$We can use integration by parts on the first term and use the fact that the field is periodic to obtain$$\delta S = \int d^6x \left[-2\lambda \phi \nabla \cdot \sigma \delta \nabla \phi + \lambda \sigma (\nabla \phi)^2 \delta \sigma \right]$$Integrating the first term by parts again, and using periodicity of the field again, we obtain$$\delta S = \int d^6x \left[2\lambda \phi \nabla^2 \sigma \delta \phi + \lambda \sigma (\nabla \phi)^2 \delta \sigma \right]$$The Euler-Lagrange equation then is$$\nabla^2 \sigma = 0$$$$\nabla^2 \phi - \lambda \sigma (\nabla \phi)^2 = 0$$These equations are independent of $Q$.
 
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
It's given a gas of particles all identical which has T fixed and spin S. Let's ##g(\epsilon)## the density of orbital states and ##g(\epsilon) = g_0## for ##\forall \epsilon \in [\epsilon_0, \epsilon_1]##, zero otherwise. How to compute the number of accessible quantum states of one particle? This is my attempt, and I suspect that is not good. Let S=0 and then bosons in a system. Simply, if we have the density of orbitals we have to integrate ##g(\epsilon)## and we have...
Back
Top