Riemann Manifold: Choosing a Basis & Lie Algebra

befj0001
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
On the spacetime manifold in general relativity, one chooses a basis at a point and express it by the partial derivatives with respect to the four coordinates in the coordinate system. And then the basis vectors in the dual space will be the differentials of the coordinates. Why do one do that? I understand that by doing so it allows one to identify the vectorfields on the manifold by a Lie algebra.

But why do one choose to do so? And why is it so important for allowing a Lie algebra of the vector fields to be defined?

Could someone give a more intuitive explanation for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The choice of a coordinate basis is not a necessary one. Non-coordinate bases are used all the time in GR as they make direct contact with measurements made by observers or fields of observers. Coordinate bases are simply easier to handle computationally.
 
The nice thing about coordinate bases is that they don't have lie brackets with respect to each other:
$$\left[\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i},\frac{\partial}{\partial x^j}\right]=0$$

This makes many computations (e.g. for the curvature tensors) simpler. It is not a requirement that one uses these bases though. One can use any linearly independent basis one wants, the other popular choice being a set of orthonormal bases (sometimes called a tetrad, frame field, or vierbien).
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top